Suppr超能文献

2型糖尿病患者中磺脲类药物和二甲双胍治疗相关的全因死亡率和心血管死亡率

All-cause and cardiovascular mortality associated with sulphonylurea and metformin therapy in type 2 diabetes.

作者信息

Ioacara Sorin, Guja Cristian, Reghina Aura, Martin Sorina, Sirbu Anca, Fica Simona

机构信息

a Department of Endocrinology and diabetes , "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy , Bucharest , Romania.

b Department of Endocrinology and diabetes , "Elias" University Emergency Hospital , Bucharest , Romania.

出版信息

Endocr Res. 2018 May;43(2):97-105. doi: 10.1080/07435800.2017.1422745. Epub 2018 Jan 8.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To test the hypothesis that cumulative exposure to sulphonylurea (SU) or metformin (MET) have different effects on mortality when taken as a replacement or add-on of one for the other.

METHODS

All consecutive diabetes patients aged over 20 years were screened at their first diabetes outpatient visit between 2001 and 2008 (n = 79869). Only patients on MET (n = 11374) or SU (n = 18502) monotherapy were retained. All patients were followed up for death until December 31, 2011, but censored at first exposure to anything else besides MET/SU. Adjusted time-dependent Cox regression and competing risk regression analysis, with daily updates of treatment modalities were performed.

RESULTS

Mean age was 62.1 ± 11.2 years and follow-up was 4.6 ± 3.2 years (138496 person-years). Adjusted all-cause and cardiovascular mortality rates were significantly higher in MET as compared with SU group. All-cause mortality hazard ratios (HR) for cumulative time exposure were as follows: HR 0.956 (95%CI 0.951-0.962, p < 0.001) for SU added to MET, HR 1.092 (95%CI 1.087-1.096, p < 0.001) for SU replacing MET, HR 0.979 (95%CI 0.975-0.983, p < 0.001) for MET added to SU, and HR 1.127 (95%CI 1.118-1.136, p < 0.001) for MET replacing SU.

CONCLUSION(S): The effect on all-cause mortality was beneficial for MET+SU combined therapy, but deleterious for either SU replacing MET, or MET replacing SU. There were no major outcome differences when analyzing individual SU, or specific mortality.

摘要

目的

检验以下假设:当磺脲类药物(SU)或二甲双胍(MET)作为彼此的替代药物或附加药物使用时,累积暴露对死亡率有不同影响。

方法

对2001年至2008年期间首次在糖尿病门诊就诊的所有20岁以上的连续糖尿病患者进行筛查(n = 79869)。仅保留接受MET单药治疗(n = 11374)或SU单药治疗(n = 18502)的患者。对所有患者进行随访直至2011年12月31日的死亡情况,但在首次暴露于MET/SU以外的任何其他药物时进行截尾。采用调整后的时间依赖性Cox回归和竞争风险回归分析,并每日更新治疗方式。

结果

平均年龄为62.1±11.2岁,随访时间为4.6±3.2年(138496人年)。与SU组相比,MET组调整后的全因死亡率和心血管死亡率显著更高。累积时间暴露的全因死亡率风险比(HR)如下:MET加用SU时HR为0.956(95%CI 0.951 - 0.962,p < 0.001),SU替代MET时HR为1.092(95%CI 1.087 - 1.096,p < 0.001),SU加用MET时HR为0.979(95%CI 0.975 - 0.983,p < 0.001),MET替代SU时HR为1.127(95%CI 1.118 - 1.136,p < 0.001)。

结论

对全因死亡率而言,MET + SU联合治疗有益,但SU替代MET或MET替代SU则有害。分析单个SU或特定死亡率时,未发现主要结局差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验