Suppr超能文献

急诊腹股沟疝修补术:Desarda法与缝合法的比较

Emergency Inguinal Hernia Repair: Comparison Of Desarda's Versus Darning Technique.

作者信息

Hussain Adeel, Mehsam Syed, Ali Mansab, Rasul Shahid, Parveen Sughra, Memon Ahson

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre, Karachi, Pakistan.

出版信息

J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2017 Oct-Dec;29(4):551-553.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Emergency inguinal hernia repair remains the commonest operation performed by general surgeons all over the world. The aim of this study was to compare the mean operative time, post-operative pain, wound infection and early recurrence between Desarda's and Darning emergency inguinal hernia repair.

METHODS

This is a randomized controlled trial conducted at Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre, Karachi. A total of 186 patients of male gender between ages 20-60 years with incarcerated, obstructed and strangulated inguinal hernia were enrolled in the study. Patients with primary and recurrent inguinal hernias were excluded. All patients were randomized to Desarda group (n=93) and Darning group (n=93).

RESULTS

Mean operative time in Desarda group was 55.53±6.81 minutes and mean operative time in darning group was 53.06±5.51 minutes (p-value 0.007). Mild to moderate pain was found insignificantly higher in Desarda group 75 (80.6%) as compared to Darning group 66 (71%) (p-value 0.170). Wound infection was found higher in Desarda group 18 (19.4%) as compared to darning group 9 (9.7%) (p-value 0.061). Recurrence was found significantly higher 15 (55.5%) in Darning group as compared to Desarda group 2 (7.4%) (p-value <0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

No significant difference was observed in the postoperative pain, wound infection however, significant differences were observed in the mean operative time and recurrence rates.

摘要

背景

急诊腹股沟疝修补术仍是全球普通外科医生最常开展的手术。本研究旨在比较Desarda法和缝合法急诊腹股沟疝修补术的平均手术时间、术后疼痛、伤口感染及早期复发情况。

方法

这是一项在卡拉奇真纳研究生医学中心进行的随机对照试验。共纳入186例年龄在20至60岁之间、患有嵌顿性、梗阻性和绞窄性腹股沟疝的男性患者。排除原发性和复发性腹股沟疝患者。所有患者随机分为Desarda组(n = 93)和缝合组(n = 93)。

结果

Desarda组平均手术时间为55.53±6.81分钟,缝合组平均手术时间为53.06±5.51分钟(p值0.007)。Desarda组75例(80.6%)出现轻至中度疼痛,略高于缝合组的66例(71%)(p值0.170)。Desarda组伤口感染率为18例(19.4%),高于缝合组的9例(9.7%)(p值0.061)。缝合组复发率显著高于Desarda组,分别为15例(55.5%)和2例(7.4%)(p值<0.001)。

结论

术后疼痛和伤口感染方面未观察到显著差异,但平均手术时间和复发率存在显著差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验