Office of Disease Prevention, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Tob Control. 2020 Jan;29(Suppl 1):s43-s49. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-054032. Epub 2018 Jan 13.
The purpose of this study is to describe the focus and comprehensiveness of domains measured in e-cigarette research.
A portfolio analysis of National Institutes of Health grants focusing on e-cigarette research and funded between the fiscal years 2007 and 2015 was conducted. Grant proposals were retrieved using a government database and coded using the Host-Agent-Vector-Environment (HAVE) model as a framework to characterise the measures proposed. Eighty-one projects met the criteria for inclusion in the analysis.
The primary HAVE focus most commonly found was Host (73%), followed by Agent (21%), Vector (6%) and Environment (0%). Intrapersonal measures and use trajectories were the most common measures in studies that include Host measures (n=59 and n=51, respectively). Product composition was the most common area of measurement in Agent studies (n=24), whereas Marketing (n=21) was the most common (n=21) area of Vector measurement. When Environment measures were examined as secondary measures in studies, they primarily focused on measuring Peer, Occupation and Social Networks (n=18). Although all studies mentioned research on e-cigarettes, most (n=52; 64%) did not specify the type of e-cigarette device or liquid solution under study.
This analysis revealed a heavy focus on Host measures (73%) and a lack of focus on Environment measures. The predominant focus on Host measures may have the unintended effect of limiting the evidence base for tobacco control and regulatory science. Further, a lack of specificity about the e-cigarette product under study will make comparing results across studies and using the outcomes to inform tobacco policy difficult.
本研究旨在描述电子烟研究中测量的各领域的重点和全面性。
对 2007 至 2015 年间美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)资助的电子烟研究重点和全面性进行了投资组合分析。使用政府数据库检索了拨款提案,并使用宿主-代理-载体-环境(HAVE)模型对其进行了编码,以描述所提出的措施。有 81 个项目符合分析要求。
最常见的主要 HAVE 重点是宿主(73%),其次是代理(21%)、载体(6%)和环境(0%)。在包含宿主措施的研究中,最常见的个体措施和使用轨迹(n=59 和 n=51)。在代理研究中,产品成分是最常见的测量领域(n=24),而营销(n=21)是最常见的(n=21)载体测量领域。当环境措施作为次要措施在研究中进行检查时,它们主要集中在测量同伴、职业和社交网络(n=18)。尽管所有研究都提到了电子烟的研究,但大多数(n=52;64%)没有指定研究的电子烟设备或液体溶液的类型。
这项分析表明,宿主措施(73%)受到高度重视,而环境措施则缺乏重视。对宿主措施的主要关注可能会无意中限制烟草控制和监管科学的证据基础。此外,对研究中电子烟产品缺乏特异性,将使比较研究结果和利用研究结果为烟草政策提供信息变得困难。