Laboratory of Research in Respiratory Pharmacology-UPRES EA220, UFR Sciences de la Santé Simone Veil, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin, Université Paris-Saclay, Suresnes, France; Department of Airway Diseases, Hôpital Foch, Suresnes, France.
Department of Airway Diseases, Hôpital Foch, Suresnes, France; Mass Spectrometry Platform & INSERM UMR1173, UFR Sciences de la Santé Simone Veil, Université Versailles Saint Quentin en Yvelines, Université Paris Saclay, Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France.
Pulm Pharmacol Ther. 2018 Apr;49:46-53. doi: 10.1016/j.pupt.2018.01.003. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
Long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs) have been recommended for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and (more recently) asthma. However, the in vitro pharmacological profiles of the four LAMAs currently marketed (tiotropium, umeclidinium, aclidinium and glycopyrronium) have not yet been compared (relative to ipratropium) by using the same experimental approach.
With a total of 560 human bronchial rings, we investigated the antagonists' potency, onset and duration of action for inhibition of the contractile response evoked by electrical field stimulation. We also evaluated the antagonists' potency for inhibiting cumulative concentration-contraction curves for acetylcholine and carbachol.
The onset and duration of action were concentration-dependent. At submaximal, equipotent concentrations, the antagonists' onsets of action were within the same order of magnitude. However, the durations of action differed markedly. After washout, ipratropium's inhibitory activity decreased rapidly (within 30-90 min) but those of tiotropium and umeclidinium remained stable (at above 70%) for at least 9 h. Aclidinium and glycopyrronium displayed less stable inhibitory effects, with a progressive loss of inhibition at submaximal concentrations. In contrast to ipratropium, all the LAMAs behaved as insurmountable antagonists by decreasing the maximum responses to both acetylcholine and carbachol.
The observed differences in the LAMAs' in vitro pharmacological profiles in the human bronchus provide a compelling pharmacological rationale for the differences in the drugs' respective recommended daily doses and frequencies of administration.
长效毒蕈碱拮抗剂(LAMA)已被推荐用于治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病和(最近)哮喘。然而,目前市场上的四种 LAMA(噻托溴铵、乌美溴铵、阿地溴铵和格隆溴铵)的体外药理学特征尚未通过相同的实验方法(相对于异丙托溴铵)进行比较。
使用总共 560 个人支气管环,我们研究了拮抗剂对电场刺激引起的收缩反应的抑制作用的效力、起效时间和作用持续时间。我们还评估了拮抗剂对乙酰胆碱和卡巴胆碱累积浓度-收缩曲线的抑制效力。
起效时间和作用持续时间均呈浓度依赖性。在亚最大等效浓度下,拮抗剂的起效时间处于相同数量级。然而,作用持续时间差异显著。洗脱后,异丙托溴铵的抑制活性迅速下降(在 30-90 分钟内),但噻托溴铵和乌美溴铵的抑制活性至少稳定(超过 70%)9 小时。阿地溴铵和格隆溴铵的抑制作用不太稳定,在亚最大浓度下抑制作用逐渐丧失。与异丙托溴铵不同,所有 LAMA 均表现为不可逾越的拮抗剂,通过降低乙酰胆碱和卡巴胆碱的最大反应来降低其最大反应。
人支气管中观察到的 LAMA 体外药理学特征的差异,为这些药物各自推荐的每日剂量和给药频率的差异提供了强有力的药理学依据。