Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Am J Ophthalmol. 2018 Jul;191:xli-lviii. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2017.12.019. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
To present the evolution of intravitreal therapy for retinal diseases and its impact on clinical practice.
Retrospective literature review and personal perspective.
Retrospective literature review and personal perspective.
Pharmacotherapeutic advances in retinal disease have been remarkable over the last 25 years. Almost all of the new drugs developed have required intravitreal administration to be highly effective, leading to an exponential increase in the annual number of intravitreal injections given. The use of intravitreal antibiotic injections to treat endophthalmitis, usually on a one-time basis, first familiarized ophthalmologists with this method of drug delivery. Ganciclovir was the first widely available, relatively inexpensive compounded drug that was used for repeat intravitreal injection to treat a chronic retinal disease, followed by triamcinolone for diabetic macular edema and bevacizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Ganciclovir was formulated for sustained-release drug delivery to avoid frequent intravitreal injections, a goal that has been more elusive for anti-VEGF drugs. Political obstacles encountered while conducting some of the trials to evaluate these treatments were substantial. Addressing the issues they raised led to important national policy changes that will impact the conduct of future clinical trials. The first comparative efficacy trial of intravitreal therapies was the Comparison of AMD Treatments Trials (CATT). The primary results from CATT and the many publications that followed continue to shape the use of intravitreal therapy today.
Intravitreal therapy has proven highly effective for the treatment of many retinal diseases. The treatment burden for patients from numerous injections, the cost to health care systems, and the impact on workflows in clinical practice have been substantial. Efforts to develop effective intravitreal therapies with reduced treatment burden and cost are ongoing.
介绍视网膜疾病的玻璃体腔内治疗的演变及其对临床实践的影响。
回顾性文献回顾和个人观点。
回顾性文献回顾和个人观点。
在过去的 25 年中,视网膜疾病的药物治疗取得了显著进展。几乎所有开发的新药都需要玻璃体内给药才能达到高度有效,导致每年进行的玻璃体内注射数量呈指数级增长。抗生素玻璃体内注射用于治疗眼内炎,通常是一次性的,首先使眼科医生熟悉这种药物输送方法。更昔洛韦是第一种广泛可用的、相对廉价的复合药物,用于重复玻璃体内注射治疗慢性视网膜疾病,其次是曲安奈德治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿,贝伐单抗治疗新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性。更昔洛韦用于持续释放药物输送,以避免频繁的玻璃体内注射,这是抗 VEGF 药物更难以实现的目标。在评估这些治疗方法的一些试验中遇到的政治障碍非常大。解决他们提出的问题导致了重要的国家政策变化,这将影响未来临床试验的进行。玻璃体腔内治疗的首次比较疗效试验是 AMD 治疗试验比较(CATT)。CATT 的主要结果和随后的许多出版物继续影响着当今玻璃体腔内治疗的应用。
玻璃体腔内治疗已被证明对许多视网膜疾病的治疗非常有效。大量注射给患者带来的治疗负担、给医疗保健系统带来的成本以及对临床实践工作流程的影响都是巨大的。正在努力开发具有减轻治疗负担和降低成本的有效玻璃体内疗法。