Imperial College Healthcare, London, UK.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2018 Mar;29(3):404-411. doi: 10.1111/jce.13425. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
Postablation reentrant ATs depend upon conducting isthmuses bordered by scar. Bipolar voltage maps highlight scar as sites of low voltage, but the voltage amplitude of an electrogram depends upon the myocardial activation sequence. Furthermore, a voltage threshold that defines atrial scar is unknown. We used Ripple Mapping (RM) to test whether these isthmuses were anatomically fixed between different activation vectors and atrial rates.
We studied post-AF ablation ATs where >1 rhythm was mapped. Multipolar catheters were used with CARTO Confidense for high-density mapping. RM visualized the pattern of activation, and the voltage threshold below which no activation was seen. Isthmuses were characterized at this threshold between maps for each patient.
Ten patients were studied (Map 1 was AT1; Map 2: sinus 1/10, LA paced 2/10, AT2 with reverse CS activation 3/10; AT2 CL difference 50 ± 30 ms). Point density was similar between maps (Map 1: 2,589 ± 1,330; Map 2: 2,214 ± 1,384; P = 0.31). RM activation threshold was 0.16 ± 0.08 mV. Thirty-one isthmuses were identified in Map 1 (median 3 per map; width 27 ± 15 mm; 7 anterior; 6 roof; 8 mitral; 9 septal; 1 posterior). Importantly, 7 of 31 (23%) isthmuses were unexpectedly identified within regions without prior ablation. AT1 was treated following ablation of 11/31 (35%) isthmuses. Of the remaining 20 isthmuses, 14 of 16 isthmuses (88%) were consistent between the two maps (four were inadequately mapped). Wavefront collision caused variation in low voltage distribution in 2 of 16 (12%).
The distribution of isthmuses and nonconducting tissue within the ablated left atrium, as defined by RM, appear concordant between rhythms. This could guide a substrate ablative approach.
消融后折返性房速(AT)依赖于由瘢痕组织包围的传导性峡部。双极电压图突出显示了瘢痕组织为低电压部位,但电信号的电压幅度取决于心肌的激活顺序。此外,定义心房瘢痕的电压阈值尚不清楚。我们使用 Ripple Mapping(RM)来测试这些峡部在不同激活向量和心房率之间是否具有解剖学上的固定性。
我们研究了消融后房速(AF)患者,其中 >1 种节律进行了标测。使用 CARTO Confidense 进行高密度标测时,使用多极导管。RM 可视化了激活模式,以及无激活时的电压阈值。在每位患者的每次标测之间,用该阈值来描述峡部特征。
共研究了 10 例患者(标测 1 为 AT1;标测 2:窦性心律 1/10、左心房起搏 2/10、CS 逆行激活的 AT2 3/10、AT2 CL 差值 50±30ms)。标测图之间的点密度相似(标测 1:2589±1330;标测 2:2214±1384;P=0.31)。RM 激活阈值为 0.16±0.08mV。在标测 1 中确定了 31 个峡部(中位数为每个标测 3 个;峡部宽度 27±15mm;7 个在前部;6 个在房顶;8 个在二尖瓣环;9 个在间隔;1 个在后部)。重要的是,在没有先前消融的区域内,意外地发现了 7 个峡部(23%)。在消融了 11/31 个峡部(35%)后,治疗了 AT1。在其余的 20 个峡部中,16 个峡部中有 14 个(88%)在两个标测图之间是一致的(4 个峡部标测不充分)。两个峡部(12%)中,波阵面碰撞导致低电压分布的变化。
RM 定义的消融后的左心房内峡部和无传导组织的分布在节律之间似乎是一致的。这可以指导基质消融方法。