Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sheba Medical Center, Tel HaShomer, Israel.
Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018 Jan 17;100(2):e8. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.17.00600.
The surgical treatment of acetabular fractures relies on the understanding of fracture architecture and their classification. The Judet and Letournel classification has been the cornerstone in understanding and treating acetabular fractures. Recently, there has been growing evidence of discrepancies and incompleteness in the Judet and Letournel classification, adversely affecting its clinical use. This study describes a novel comprehensive classification system that will direct surgical approach and fixation methods.
A retrospective study of patients with acetabular fractures treated at a level-I trauma center also serving as a referral center for acetabular fractures was performed. Fractures were classified according to both the novel and Judet and Letournel classification systems. The novel classification developed integrates the displacement vector (posterior, superomedial, or combined) and the fractured anatomic structures (anteroposterior wall, pelvic brim, iliac wing, quadrilateral plate, and ischium). Furthermore, postoperative malreduction was evaluated on the basis of intra-articular gap measurements in either anteroposterior or Judet oblique views.
The study included 229 patients with acetabular fractures treated between 2007 and 2016. The mean patient age (and standard deviation) was 46.7 ± 21.75 years, and 172 patients (75.1%) were surgically treated. According to the novel classification system, the posterior displacement vector group included 60 patients, the superomedial displacement vector group included 130 patients, the combined displacement vector group included 36 patients, and 3 patients were unclassified by the new system. Forty-six patients (20.1%) could not be classified by the Judet and Letournel classification. Pelvic-brim fracture patterns were described as along the pelvic brim, across the pelvic brim, or comminuted. The quadrilateral plate primary fracture line was shown to be perpendicular to the pelvic brim. The selection of surgical approach and fixation methods depends on the fracture type.
This study presents a novel classification system for acetabular fractures. It offers a complete classification system, encompassing nearly all fracture patterns. As the selection of surgical approach and fixation methods depends on fracture classification and understanding, the novel classification system can aid the surgeon with decision-making.
髋臼骨折的手术治疗依赖于对骨折结构及其分类的理解。Judet 和 Letournel 分类一直是理解和治疗髋臼骨折的基石。最近,有越来越多的证据表明 Judet 和 Letournel 分类存在差异和不完整,对其临床应用产生了不利影响。本研究描述了一种新的综合分类系统,该系统将指导手术入路和固定方法。
对在一家一级创伤中心治疗的髋臼骨折患者进行回顾性研究,该中心也是髋臼骨折的转诊中心。骨折根据新的和 Judet 和 Letournel 分类系统进行分类。新开发的分类系统整合了位移矢量(后、上内侧或混合)和骨折解剖结构(前、后壁、骨盆边缘、髂骨翼、四边形板和坐骨)。此外,根据在前后位或 Judet 斜位测量关节内间隙,评估术后复位不良。
研究纳入了 2007 年至 2016 年间治疗的 229 例髋臼骨折患者。患者平均年龄(标准差)为 46.7 ± 21.75 岁,172 例(75.1%)患者接受了手术治疗。根据新的分类系统,后向位移矢量组包括 60 例患者,上内侧位移矢量组包括 130 例患者,混合位移矢量组包括 36 例患者,3 例患者无法用新系统分类。46 例(20.1%)患者无法用 Judet 和 Letournel 分类。骨盆边缘骨折模式描述为沿骨盆边缘、横过骨盆边缘或粉碎性。四边形板的主要骨折线与骨盆边缘垂直。手术入路和固定方法的选择取决于骨折类型。
本研究提出了一种新的髋臼骨折分类系统。它提供了一个完整的分类系统,包括几乎所有的骨折模式。由于手术入路和固定方法的选择取决于骨折分类和理解,新的分类系统可以帮助外科医生做出决策。