Division of Allergy, Pulmonary, and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Am J Epidemiol. 2018 Jul 1;187(7):1490-1500. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwy008.
We sought to determine the real-world effectiveness of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) immunoprophylaxis in a population-based cohort to inform policy. The study population included infants born during 1996-2008 and enrolled in the Kaiser Permanente Northern California integrated health-care delivery system. During the RSV season (November-March), the date of RSV immunoprophylaxis administration and the following 30 days were defined as RSV immunoprophylaxis protected period(s), and all other days were defined as unprotected period(s). Numbers of bronchiolitis hospitalizations were determined using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, codes during RSV season. We used a proportional hazards model to estimate risk of bronchiolitis hospitalization when comparing infants' protected period(s) with unprotected period(s). Infants who had ever received RSV immunoprophylaxis had a 32% decreased risk of bronchiolitis hospitalization (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.68, 95% confidence interval: 0.46, 1.00) when protected periods were compared with unprotected periods. Infants with chronic lung disease (CLD) had a 52% decreased risk of bronchiolitis hospitalization (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.48, 95% confidence interval: 0.25, 0.94) when protected periods were compared with unprotected periods. Under the new 2014 American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) guidelines, 48% of infants eligible for RSV immunoprophylaxis on the basis of AAP guidelines in place at birth would no longer be eligible, but nearly all infants with CLD would remain eligible. RSV immunoprophylaxis is effective in decreasing hospitalization. This association is greatest for infants with CLD, a group still recommended for receipt of RSV immunoprophylaxis under the new AAP guidelines.
我们旨在通过一项基于人群的队列研究来确定呼吸道合胞病毒(RSV)免疫预防在现实世界中的效果,为相关政策制定提供信息。研究人群包括 1996 年至 2008 年期间出生并加入 Kaiser Permanente 北加州综合医疗保健系统的婴儿。在 RSV 季节(11 月至 3 月)期间,将 RSV 免疫预防管理的日期及其后 30 天定义为 RSV 免疫预防保护期,其余所有天数定义为非保护期。在 RSV 季节期间,使用国际疾病分类第 9 版代码确定毛细支气管炎住院人数。我们使用比例风险模型比较婴儿的保护期和非保护期来估计毛细支气管炎住院的风险。与非保护期相比,曾经接受过 RSV 免疫预防的婴儿毛细支气管炎住院的风险降低了 32%(调整后的危险比=0.68,95%置信区间:0.46,1.00)。与非保护期相比,患有慢性肺病(CLD)的婴儿毛细支气管炎住院的风险降低了 52%(调整后的危险比=0.48,95%置信区间:0.25,0.94)。根据 2014 年美国儿科学会(AAP)新指南,根据出生时 AAP 指南,有 48%符合 RSV 免疫预防条件的婴儿将不再符合条件,但几乎所有患有 CLD 的婴儿仍将符合条件。RSV 免疫预防可有效降低住院率。这种关联对于患有 CLD 的婴儿最大,根据新的 AAP 指南,该组仍推荐接受 RSV 免疫预防。