Division of Pediatric Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, Stollery Children's Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Division of Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
JAMA Pediatr. 2018 Mar 1;172(3):257-268. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.4540.
After initial resuscitation, critically ill children may accumulate fluid and develop fluid overload. Accruing evidence suggests that fluid overload contributes to greater complexity of care and worse outcomes.
To describe the methods to measure fluid balance, define fluid overload, and evaluate the association between fluid balance and outcomes in critically ill children.
Systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, trial registries, and selected gray literature from inception to March 2017.
Studies of children admitted to pediatric intensive care units that described fluid balance or fluid overload and reported outcomes of interest were included. No language restrictions were applied.
All stages were conducted independently by 2 reviewers. Data extracted included study characteristics, population, fluid metrics, and outcomes. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Narrative description of fluid assessment methods and fluid overload definitions was done. When feasible, pooled analyses were performed using random-effects models.
Mortality was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included treatment intensity, organ failure, and resource use.
A total of 44 studies (7507 children) were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. Of those, 27 (61%) were retrospective cohort studies, 13 (30%) were prospective cohort studies, 3 (7%) were case-control studies, and 1 study (2%) was a secondary analysis of a randomized trial. The proportion of children with fluid overload varied by case mix and fluid overload definition (median, 33%; range, 10%-83%). Fluid overload, however defined, was associated with increased in-hospital mortality (17 studies [n = 2853]; odds ratio [OR], 4.34 [95% CI, 3.01-6.26]; I2 = 61%). Survivors had lower percentage fluid overload than nonsurvivors (22 studies [n = 2848]; mean difference, -5.62 [95% CI, -7.28 to -3.97]; I2 = 76%). After adjustment for illness severity, there was a 6% increase in odds of mortality for every 1% increase in percentage fluid overload (11 studies [n = 3200]; adjusted OR, 1.06 [95% CI, 1.03-1.10]; I2 = 66%). Fluid overload was associated with increased risk for prolonged mechanical ventilation (>48 hours) (3 studies [n = 631]; OR, 2.14 [95% CI, 1.25-3.66]; I2 = 0%) and acute kidney injury (7 studies [n = 1833]; OR, 2.36 [95% CI, 1.27-4.38]; I2 = 78%).
Fluid overload is common and is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality in critically ill children. Additional research should now ideally focus on interventions aimed to mitigate the potential for harm associated with fluid overload.
在初始复苏后,危重病儿童可能会积聚液体并发生液体超负荷。越来越多的证据表明,液体超负荷会导致更复杂的治疗和更差的结果。
描述测量液体平衡、定义液体超负荷以及评估液体平衡与危重病儿童结局之间关系的方法。
系统检索 MEDLINE、EMBASE、Cochrane 图书馆、试验注册处和选定的灰色文献,时间从成立到 2017 年 3 月。
纳入描述了液体平衡或液体超负荷并报告了感兴趣结局的儿科重症监护病房收治的儿童研究。未应用语言限制。
所有阶段均由 2 位评审员独立进行。提取的数据包括研究特征、人群、液体指标和结局。使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表评估偏倚风险。对液体评估方法和液体超负荷定义进行了描述性说明。在可行的情况下,使用随机效应模型进行了汇总分析。
死亡率是主要结局。次要结局包括治疗强度、器官衰竭和资源利用。
本系统评价和荟萃分析共纳入 44 项研究(7507 名儿童)。其中,27 项(61%)为回顾性队列研究,13 项(30%)为前瞻性队列研究,3 项(7%)为病例对照研究,1 项(2%)为随机试验的二次分析。根据病例组合和液体超负荷定义,液体超负荷的比例有所不同(中位数,33%;范围,10%-83%)。然而,无论如何定义液体超负荷,都与住院死亡率增加相关(17 项研究[n=2853];比值比[OR],4.34[95% CI,3.01-6.26];I 2=61%)。幸存者的液体超负荷百分比低于非幸存者(22 项研究[n=2848];平均差异,-5.62[95% CI,-7.28 至-3.97];I 2=76%)。在调整疾病严重程度后,液体超负荷百分比每增加 1%,死亡率的比值比增加 6%(11 项研究[n=3200];调整后的 OR,1.06[95% CI,1.03-1.10];I 2=66%)。液体超负荷与机械通气时间延长(>48 小时)(3 项研究[n=631];OR,2.14[95% CI,1.25-3.66];I 2=0%)和急性肾损伤(7 项研究[n=1833];OR,2.36[95% CI,1.27-4.38];I 2=78%)风险增加相关。
液体超负荷在危重病儿童中很常见,与严重发病率和死亡率密切相关。现在,理想情况下,应将更多的研究重点放在旨在减轻与液体超负荷相关潜在危害的干预措施上。