Medical Faculty Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany; Diaverum Deutschland, Potsdam, Germany.
Clinic of Nephrology and Hypertension, Diabetes and Endocrinology, Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany; Department of Intensive Care, German Heart Center Leipzig, University Clinic, Leipzig, Germany.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Jun;155(6):2441-2452.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.12.056. Epub 2017 Dec 22.
This study aimed to determine the biomarker-specific outcome patterns and short-and long-term prognosis of cardiac surgery-asoociated acute kidney injury (AKI) identified by standard criteria and/or urinary kidney biomarkers.
Patients enrolled (N = 200), originated a German multicenter study (NCT00672334). Standard risk injury, failure, loss, and end-stage renal disease classification (RIFLE) criteria (including serum creatinine and urine output) and urinary kidney biomarker test result (neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin, midkine, interleukin 6, and proteinuria) were used for diagnosis of postoperative AKI. Primary end point was acute renal replacement therapy or in-hospital mortality. Long-term end points among others included 5-year mortality. Patients with single-biomarker-positive subclinical AKI (RIFLE negative) were identified. We controlled for systemic inflammation using C-reactive protein test.
Urinary biomarkers (neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin, midkine, and interleukin 6) were identified as independent predictors of the primary end point. Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin, midkine, or interleukin 6 positivity or de novo/worsening proteinuria identified 21.1%, 16.9%, 30.5%, and 48.0% more cases, respectively, with likely subclinical AKI (biomarker positive/RIFLE negative) additionally to cases with RIFLE positivity alone. Patients with likely subclinical AKI (neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin or interleukin 6 positive) had increased risk of primary end point (adjusted hazard ratio, 7.18; 95% confidence interval, 1.52-33.93 [P = .013] and hazard ratio, 6.27; 95% confidence interval, 1.12-35.21 [P = .037]), respectively. Compared with biomarker-negative/RIFLE-positive patients, neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin positive/RIFLE-positive or midkine-positive/RIFLE-positive patients had increased risk of primary end point (odds ratio, 9.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-67.3 [P = .033] and odds ratio, 14.7; 95% confidence interval, 2.0-109.2 [P = .011], respectively). Three percent to 11% of patients appear to be influenced by single-biomarker-positive subclinical AKI. During follow-up, kidney biomarker-defined short-term outcomes appeared to translate into long-term outcomes.
Urinary kidney biomarkers identified RIFLE-negative patients with high-risk subclinical AKI as well as a higher risk subgroup of patients among RIFLE-AKI-positive patients. These findings support the concept that urinary biomarkers define subclinical AKI and higher risk subpopulations with worse long-term prognosis among standard patients with AKI.
本研究旨在确定通过标准标准和/或尿肾生物标志物鉴定的心脏手术相关急性肾损伤(AKI)的生物标志物特异性结局模式和短期及长期预后。
纳入的患者(N=200)来自德国多中心研究(NCT00672334)。标准风险损伤、衰竭、损失和终末期肾脏疾病分类(RIFLE)标准(包括血清肌酐和尿量)和尿液肾生物标志物检测结果(中性粒细胞明胶酶相关脂质运载蛋白、中期因子、白细胞介素 6 和蛋白尿)用于诊断术后 AKI。主要终点为急性肾替代治疗或院内死亡率。其他长期终点包括 5 年死亡率。确定了具有单生物标志物阳性亚临床 AKI(RIFLE 阴性)的患者。我们使用 C 反应蛋白试验控制全身炎症。
尿生物标志物(中性粒细胞明胶酶相关脂质运载蛋白、中期因子和白细胞介素 6)被确定为主要终点的独立预测因子。中性粒细胞明胶酶相关脂质运载蛋白、中期因子或白细胞介素 6 阳性或新出现/恶化蛋白尿分别确定了 21.1%、16.9%、30.5%和 48.0%的情况下,可能存在亚临床 AKI(生物标志物阳性/RIFLE 阴性),除了 RIFLE 阳性病例。可能存在亚临床 AKI(中性粒细胞明胶酶相关脂质运载蛋白或白细胞介素 6 阳性)的患者主要终点风险增加(调整后的危险比,7.18;95%置信区间,1.52-33.93[P=0.013]和危险比,6.27;95%置信区间,1.12-35.21[P=0.037])。与生物标志物阴性/RIFLE 阳性患者相比,中性粒细胞明胶酶相关脂质运载蛋白阳性/RIFLE 阳性或中期因子阳性/RIFLE 阳性患者主要终点风险增加(优势比,9.6;95%置信区间,1.4-67.3[P=0.033]和优势比,14.7;95%置信区间,2.0-109.2[P=0.011])。大约 3%至 11%的患者可能受到单生物标志物阳性亚临床 AKI 的影响。在随访期间,肾脏生物标志物定义的短期结局似乎转化为长期结局。
尿肾生物标志物确定了 RIFLE 阴性的高危亚临床 AKI 患者以及 RIFLE-AKI 阳性患者中的更高风险亚组患者。这些发现支持这样的概念,即尿生物标志物定义亚临床 AKI 和标准 AKI 患者中预后较差的更高风险亚群。