Department of Internal, Emergency and Vascular Medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Department of Cardiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Emerg Med J. 2018 Apr;35(4):226-230. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2017-207207. Epub 2018 Jan 24.
Orthostasis is a frequent trigger for (pre)syncope but some forms of orthostatic (pre)syncope have a worse prognosis than others. Routine assessment of orthostatic BP in the ED can detect classic orthostatic hypotension, but often misses these other forms of orthostatic (pre)syncope. This study aimed to determine the frequency of abnormal orthostatic BP recovery patterns in patients with (pre)syncope by using continuous non-invasive BP monitoring.
We performed a prospective cohort study in suspected patients with (pre)syncope in the ED of a tertiary care teaching hospital between January and August 2014. Orthostatic BP was measured during the active lying-to-standing test with Nexfin, a continuous non-invasive finger arterial pressure measurement device. Orthostatic BP recovery patterns were defined as normal BP recovery, initial orthostatic hypotension, delayed BP recovery, classic orthostatic hypotension and reflex-mediated hypotension.
Of 116 patients recruited, measurements in 111 patients (age 63 years, 51% male) were suitable for analysis. Classic orthostatic hypotension was the most prevalent abnormal BP pattern (19%), but only half of the patients received a final diagnosis of orthostatic hypotension. Initial orthostatic hypotension and delayed BP recovery were present in 20% of the patients with (pre)syncope of whom 45% were diagnosed as unexplained syncope. Reflex-mediated hypotension was present in 4% of the patients.
Continuous non-invasive BP measurement can potentially identify more specific and concerning causes of orthostatic (pre)syncope. Correct classification is important because of different short-term and long-term clinical implications.
直立性是(先兆)晕厥的常见诱因,但某些类型的直立性(先兆)晕厥比其他类型预后更差。ED 中常规评估直立位血压可以检测到经典的直立性低血压,但经常会漏掉其他类型的直立性(先兆)晕厥。本研究旨在通过连续非侵入性血压监测来确定(先兆)晕厥患者异常直立性血压恢复模式的频率。
我们在 2014 年 1 月至 8 月期间在三级教学医院的 ED 中对疑似(先兆)晕厥的患者进行了前瞻性队列研究。使用连续非侵入性手指动脉血压测量装置 Nexfin 在主动卧位到立位测试中测量直立性血压。将直立性血压恢复模式定义为正常血压恢复、初始直立性低血压、血压恢复延迟、经典直立性低血压和反射介导性低血压。
在招募的 116 名患者中,111 名患者(年龄 63 岁,51%为男性)的测量结果适合分析。经典直立性低血压是最常见的异常血压模式(19%),但只有一半的患者被诊断为直立性低血压。初始直立性低血压和血压恢复延迟在 20%的(先兆)晕厥患者中存在,其中 45%被诊断为不明原因晕厥。反射介导性低血压在 4%的患者中存在。
连续非侵入性血压测量可能会发现更具体和更相关的直立性(先兆)晕厥原因。正确的分类很重要,因为这涉及到不同的短期和长期临床影响。