Strasburger Christian J, Mattsson Anders, Wilton Patrick, Aydin Ferah, Hey-Hadavi Judith, Biller Beverly M K
Department of Medicine for EndocrinologyDiabetes and Nutritional Medicine, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Campus Mitte, Berlin, Germany
Endocrine CarePfizer Health AB, Sollentuna, Sweden.
Eur J Endocrinol. 2018 Apr;178(4):321-329. doi: 10.1530/EJE-17-0996. Epub 2018 Jan 25.
Pegvisomant monotherapy is effective and safe in treatment of acromegaly. However, some clinicians combine pegvisomant with somatostatin analogues (SSA) or dopamine agonist (DA). In this analysis of ACROSTUDY, a long-term non-interventional study, the use of combination regimens was evaluated. Based on their baseline treatment, 2043 patients were retrospectively categorized as: long-acting SSA combined with pegvisomant, 'Combo SSA' 768 patients (38%); DA combined with pegvisomant, 'Combo DA' 123 (6%); pegvisomant monotherapy, 'Peg mono' 1128 (55%). Treatment patterns changed over the 10-year period, with recent patients more likely to receive any combination (20% in 2003 vs 54% in 2012). Combo SSA use varied widely among countries from 22% to 78%. Exposure periods of the three treatment modalities were defined from pegvisomant start until the last visit in ACROSTUDY; patients could switch treatment categories. At year 4, IGF-I was normal in 62% of Combo SSA, 63% of Combo DA and 65% of Peg mono groups. Pegvisomant was initiated as daily injections in 94% of patients in the Peg mono group, 66% of Combo SSA and 91% of Combo DA patients. During 6169 years of treatment exposure, 3424 adverse events (AEs) were reported in 946 (51%) patients, of which 617 (18%) were serious and 401 (12%) were considered treatment related. The reported incidence of serious AEs and treatment-related non-serious AEs were similar among the three treatment modalities. This analysis describes real-world clinical care and shows favorable efficacy and safety for Peg mono and combinations. Novel findings include an increased use of combination therapy over time and variability in treatment modalities between countries.
培维索孟单药治疗肢端肥大症有效且安全。然而,一些临床医生将培维索孟与生长抑素类似物(SSA)或多巴胺激动剂(DA)联合使用。在这项对ACROSTUDY(一项长期非干预性研究)的分析中,对联合治疗方案的使用情况进行了评估。根据基线治疗情况,2043例患者被回顾性分类为:长效SSA联合培维索孟,“联合SSA”组768例患者(38%);DA联合培维索孟,“联合DA”组123例患者(6%);培维索孟单药治疗,“培维索孟单药”组1128例患者(55%)。在这10年期间治疗模式发生了变化,近期患者更有可能接受任何联合治疗(2003年为20%,2012年为54%)。联合SSA的使用在不同国家差异很大,从22%到78%不等。三种治疗方式的暴露期定义为从培维索孟开始使用直至ACROSTUDY中的最后一次随访;患者可以更换治疗类别。在第4年时,联合SSA组62%、联合DA组63%以及培维索孟单药组65%的患者胰岛素样生长因子-I(IGF-I)水平正常。培维索孟单药组94%的患者、联合SSA组66%的患者以及联合DA组91%的患者开始时采用每日注射给药。在6169年的治疗暴露期间,946例(51%)患者报告了3424起不良事件(AE),其中617起(18%)为严重不良事件,401起(12%)被认为与治疗相关。三种治疗方式中报告的严重不良事件以及与治疗相关的非严重不良事件的发生率相似。该分析描述了实际临床治疗情况,并显示培维索孟单药治疗及其联合治疗具有良好的疗效和安全性。新发现包括随着时间推移联合治疗的使用增加以及不同国家治疗方式存在差异。