Suppr超能文献

疼痛是全球子宫内膜消融术失败的独立危险因素。

Pain is an Independent Risk Factor for Failed Global Endometrial Ablation.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Christiana Care Health System, Newark, Delaware.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Christiana Care Health System, Newark, Delaware.

出版信息

J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018 Sep-Oct;25(6):1018-1023. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2018.01.020. Epub 2018 Jan 31.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To determine whether pain, as part of an indication for global endometrial ablation, is an independent risk factor for failure.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2).

SETTING

Academic-affiliated community hospital.

PATIENTS

Women undergoing global endometrial ablation with radiofrequency ablation (RFA), hydrothermablation (HTA), or uterine balloon ablation (UBA) between January 2003 and December 2015.

INTERVENTIONS

Procedure failure was defined as subsequent hysterectomy after the index ablation.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

A total of 5818 women who underwent an endometrial ablation were identified, including 3706 with RFA (63.7%), 1786 with HTA (30.7%), and 326 with UBA (5.6%). Of the 5818 ablations, 437 (7.5%) involved pain (i.e., pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, lower abdominal pain, endometriosis, or adenomyosis) before ablation, along with abnormal uterine bleeding. Pain as part of the preoperative diagnoses before endometrial ablation was a significant risk factor for subsequent hysterectomy compared with all other diagnoses (19.2% vs 13.5%; p = .001). Consistent with previous studies, women who underwent ablation at an older age were less likely to fail, which held true even when one of the indications for ablation was related to pain (odds ratio, 0.96/year; 95% confidence interval, 0.95-0.97). When the pathology reports of women who underwent a hysterectomy were examined, women in the pain group had lower rates of adenomyosis than women without pain (38.1% vs 50.1%; p = .04). However, there was a trend toward a higher rate of endometriosis on pathology reports (14.3% vs 8.7%; p = .09) and even higher rates of visualized endometriosis identified by operative reports in women who had pain before their ablation (42.9% vs 15.8%; p < .001). Patients who had pain before their ablation were less likely to have myomas/polyps (p = .01).

CONCLUSION

Pelvic pain before global endometrial ablation is an independent risk factor for failure.

摘要

研究目的

确定疼痛是否作为子宫内膜消融术的适应证之一是失败的独立危险因素。

设计

回顾性队列研究(加拿大工作队分级 II-2)。

地点

学术附属社区医院。

患者

2003 年 1 月至 2015 年 12 月期间接受射频消融术(RFA)、水热消融术(HTA)或子宫球囊消融术(UBA)的全球子宫内膜消融术患者。

干预措施

术后失败定义为消融术后的后续子宫切除术。

测量和主要结果

共确定了 5818 名接受子宫内膜消融术的女性,其中 3706 名接受 RFA(63.7%),1786 名接受 HTA(30.7%),326 名接受 UBA(5.6%)。在 5818 次消融术中,437 次(7.5%)涉及疼痛(即盆腔疼痛、痛经、性交痛、下腹痛、子宫内膜异位症或子宫腺肌病)和异常子宫出血。与所有其他诊断相比,疼痛是消融术前诊断的一部分,是随后发生子宫切除术的显著危险因素(19.2%比 13.5%;p=0.001)。与既往研究一致,消融时年龄较大的女性失败的可能性较小,即使消融的适应证之一与疼痛有关也是如此(优势比,0.96/年;95%置信区间,0.95-0.97)。当检查接受子宫切除术的女性的病理报告时,疼痛组的腺肌病发生率低于无疼痛组(38.1%比 50.1%;p=0.04)。然而,在病理报告中子宫内膜异位症的发生率有上升趋势(14.3%比 8.7%;p=0.09),在消融术前有疼痛的女性中,手术报告中甚至更高比例的子宫内膜异位症得到了明确诊断(42.9%比 15.8%;p<0.001)。消融术前有疼痛的患者患肌瘤/息肉的可能性较小(p=0.01)。

结论

全球子宫内膜消融术前的盆腔疼痛是失败的独立危险因素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验