Zhu Yixiang, Xing Puyuan, Wang Shouzheng, Ma Di, Mu Yuxin, Li Xue, Xu Ziyi, Li Junling
National Cancer Center, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Thorac Cancer. 2018 Mar;9(3):400-407. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.12594. Epub 2018 Jan 29.
This study aims to explore the application of actual carboplatin in carboplatin plus pemetrexed regimen as first-line treatment for advanced lung adenocarcinoma, and to determine the recommended dose of carboplatin for Chinese populations.
From January 2014 to April 2016, 151 advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients who received carboplatin and pemetrexed (500 mg/m ) were included. The area under the curve (AUC) of carboplatin was back-calculated from actual dosages using the Calvert formula. According to the median of calculated AUC, patients were divided into AUC ≥4 and <4 groups.
The median of AUC was 4 (1.8-5.5). A total of 79 patients had an AUC ≥4 and 72 patients had an AUC <4. The mean relative dose intensities of pemetrexed were 100.4% for the AUC ≥4 group, and 101.4% for <4 group. Baseline characteristic variables were balanced between the two groups, except for Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance score (P = 0.044). The overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 33.8% and 90.1%, respectively, 35.4% and 86.1% for the AUC ≥4 group, and 31.9% and 94.4% for the AUC <4 group. No significant difference was observed in ORR (P = 0.650) and DCR (P = 0.086) between the two groups.
Compared with an AUC of 5 or 6, the actual clinical application of AUC was generally insufficient for Chinese populations; fortunately, therapeutic efficacy remained equal. We found that AUC <4 was as adequate as AUC ≥4 in pemetrexed plus carboplatin regimen as first-line treatment for them.
本研究旨在探讨实际应用的卡铂在卡铂联合培美曲塞方案作为晚期肺腺癌一线治疗中的应用,并确定中国人群卡铂的推荐剂量。
纳入2014年1月至2016年4月期间接受卡铂和培美曲塞(500mg/m²)治疗的151例晚期肺腺癌患者。使用卡尔弗特公式根据实际剂量反推卡铂的曲线下面积(AUC)。根据计算得到的AUC中位数,将患者分为AUC≥4组和<4组。
AUC中位数为4(1.8 - 5.5)。共有79例患者AUC≥4,72例患者AUC<4。培美曲塞的平均相对剂量强度在AUC≥4组为100.4%,在<4组为101.4%。除东部肿瘤协作组体能状态评分外(P = 0.044),两组间基线特征变量均衡。总体缓解率(ORR)和疾病控制率(DCR)分别为33.8%和90.1%,AUC≥4组分别为35.4%和86.1%,AUC<4组分别为31.9%和94.4%。两组间ORR(P = 0.650)和DCR(P = 0.086)无显著差异。
与AUC为5或6相比,AUC在中国人群中的实际临床应用普遍不足;幸运的是,治疗效果相当。我们发现,在培美曲塞联合卡铂方案作为一线治疗时,AUC<4与AUC≥4一样合适。