Department of Ethology, Institute of Animal Science, Uhríneves, Czech Republic.
Department of Ethology, Institute of Animal Science, Uhříněves, Czech Republic.
J Anim Sci. 2018 Feb 15;96(1):11-16. doi: 10.1093/jas/skx014.
Piglet vocalization rates are used as welfare indicators. The emission rates of the two gross categories of piglet calls, namely low frequency calls ("grunts") and high frequency calls ("screams"), may contain different information about the piglet's internal state due to differing communicative functions of the two call types. More knowledge is needed about the sources of variation in calling rates within and between piglets. We examined to what extent the emission rates of the two call types are codetermined by individual and litter identity, i.e., whether the rates are repeatable within individuals and similar between littermates. We recorded frequency of grunts and screams in one mildly negative (short-term Isolation) and one moderately negative (manual Restraint) situation during the first week (week 1) and the 4th week (week 4) of life and asked the following questions: 1) Are within-individual vocalization rates stable across the suckling period? 2) Are within-individual vocalization rates stable across the two situations? 3) Is there within-litter similarity in vocalization rates? 4) Does this within-litter similarity increase during the suckling period? Within-individual vocalization rates were stable between week 1 and week 4 (grunts in Restraint P < 0.05; grunts in Isolation P < 0.001; screams in Restraint P < 0.001; screams in Isolation P < 0.001). Across the two situations at the same age, the vocalization rates were not stable for grunts but were stable for screams at week 1 and week 4 (P < 0.05). Vocalization rates were more similar between littermates than between piglets belonging to different litters (grunts in Restraint P < 0.001; grunts in Isolation P < 0.01; screams in Restraint P < 0.001; screams in Isolation P < 0.001). This litter effect did not grow stronger from week 1 to week 4 as the within-litter coefficient of variance did not decrease between the two ages. Sex of the piglet had no influence on vocalization rates while greater body weight was associated with lower screaming rates in the Restraint situation (P < 0.05). In conclusion, our study demonstrates that both individuality of the piglet and litter identity affect the vocalization rates of piglets in negatively valenced situations. For screams, the repeatability of individual vocalization rates holds even across situations, while for grunts, the rates are repeatable during ontogeny within the situations, but not across situations.
仔猪的发声率被用作福利指标。两种主要的仔猪叫声,即低频叫声(“呼噜声”)和高频叫声(“尖叫声”)的发声率可能包含了仔猪内部状态的不同信息,因为这两种叫声类型具有不同的交际功能。对于仔猪在个体和窝内叫声率的变化来源,我们需要更多的了解。我们研究了仔猪在个体和窝内的叫声率在多大程度上受到个体和窝身份的共同决定,即个体在个体内的叫声率是否可重复,以及同窝仔猪之间的叫声率是否相似。我们在生命的第一周(第 1 周)和第四周(第 4 周)记录了轻度负面(短期隔离)和中度负面(手动限制)情况下的呼噜声和尖叫声的频率,并提出了以下问题:1)个体内的发声率在哺乳期是否稳定?2)个体内的发声率在两种情况下是否稳定?3)窝内的发声率是否相似?4)这种窝内的相似性是否在哺乳期内增加?个体内的发声率在第 1 周和第 4 周之间是稳定的(限制时的呼噜声 P < 0.05;隔离时的呼噜声 P < 0.001;限制时的尖叫声 P < 0.001;隔离时的尖叫声 P < 0.001)。在同一年龄的两种情况下,呼噜声的发声率不稳定,但尖叫声的发声率在第 1 周和第 4 周是稳定的(P < 0.05)。同窝仔猪之间的发声率比不同窝仔猪之间的发声率更相似(限制时的呼噜声 P < 0.001;隔离时的呼噜声 P < 0.01;限制时的尖叫声 P < 0.001;隔离时的尖叫声 P < 0.001)。这种窝内效应并没有随着仔猪年龄的增长而增强,因为两个年龄段之间的窝内变异系数并没有减小。仔猪的性别对发声率没有影响,而体重较大的仔猪在限制情况下的尖叫率较低(P < 0.05)。总之,我们的研究表明,仔猪的个体性和窝身份都会影响仔猪在负面情况下的发声率。对于尖叫声,个体发声率的可重复性甚至在不同情况下都保持一致,而对于呼噜声,在同一情况下,个体在发育过程中的发声率是可重复的,但在不同情况下则不可重复。