Suppr超能文献

根尖手术的临床及影像学结果:一项临床研究

Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Apical Surgery: A Clinical Study.

作者信息

Öğütlü Faruk, Karaca İnci

机构信息

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Gazi University, 82. Street 06510, Emek, Ankara Turkey.

出版信息

J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2018 Mar;17(1):75-83. doi: 10.1007/s12663-017-1008-9. Epub 2017 Apr 8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Endodontic treatment is usually indicated when teeth with periapical lesions are encountered. However, sometimes root canal treatment results in failure. In that case, one of the treatment choices is retreatment by an orthograde approach. Surgical endodontic therapy is also an alternative to preserve the tooth. Various techniques have been suggested in the literature which has more predictable results. The introduction of modern surgical techniques have enhanced the results of apical surgery procedures. Operating microscopes, magnifying loupes, microinstruments, ultrasonic tips, and biologically acceptable root-end filling materials (such as MTA and SuperEBA) have been introduced to this field with the modern technique, thus the success rates of modern apical surgery has increased significantly.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes and periotest values of apical surgery treatment.

METHODS

A total of 112 teeth were included. SuperEBA and MTA were used as root-filling materials. The recorded parameters were gender, age, location of the tooth, the presence/absence of a post, coronal restoration of the tooth, previous surgical/nonsurgical treatment of the tooth, the size of periapical lesions, histopathology of periapical lesions, smoking habits. Also the periotest values were recorded.

RESULTS

The overall success rate was 88.4%. With regard to the evaluated variables, only one parameter (tooth type) was found statistically significant. Although the periotest values were decreased after 6 months compared to immediately postoperative measurements, the values were still significantly higher than preoperative measurements.

CONCLUSION

In this study, apical surgery performed with the modern instruments has significantly successful results with 88.4% success rate.

摘要

背景

当遇到患有根尖周病变的牙齿时,通常需要进行牙髓治疗。然而,有时根管治疗会失败。在这种情况下,治疗选择之一是采用顺行法进行再治疗。外科牙髓治疗也是保留患牙的一种替代方法。文献中提出了各种技术,其结果更具可预测性。现代外科技术的引入提高了根尖手术的效果。手术显微镜、放大 loupes、微型器械、超声尖以及生物相容性良好的根充材料(如MTA和SuperEBA)已随着现代技术被引入该领域,因此现代根尖手术的成功率显著提高。

目的

本研究的目的是评估根尖手术治疗的临床和影像学结果以及牙周测试值。

方法

共纳入112颗牙齿。使用SuperEBA和MTA作为根充材料。记录的参数包括性别、年龄、牙齿位置、是否有桩、牙齿的冠部修复情况、牙齿先前的手术/非手术治疗情况、根尖周病变的大小、根尖周病变的组织病理学、吸烟习惯。同时记录牙周测试值。

结果

总体成功率为88.4%。关于评估的变量,仅发现一个参数(牙齿类型)具有统计学意义。尽管与术后立即测量相比,6个月后的牙周测试值有所下降,但这些值仍显著高于术前测量值。

结论

在本研究中,使用现代器械进行的根尖手术取得了显著成功,成功率为88.4%。

相似文献

1
Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Apical Surgery: A Clinical Study.
J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2018 Mar;17(1):75-83. doi: 10.1007/s12663-017-1008-9. Epub 2017 Apr 8.
2
Endodontic procedures for retreatment of periapical lesions.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 19;10(10):CD005511. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005511.pub3.
7
Treatment decisions in 330 cases referred for apical surgery.
J Endod. 2014 Feb;40(2):187-91. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.10.024. Epub 2013 Dec 7.
9
Endodontic surgery using 2 different magnification devices: preliminary results of a randomized controlled study.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006 Feb;64(2):235-42. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2005.10.033.
10
[A retrospective study of 180 cases of apical microsurgery].
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2014 Jul;49(7):421-7.

引用本文的文献

1
[Interpretation of periapical healing in radiological images. A review].
Rev Cient Odontol (Lima). 2021 Dec 9;9(4):e087. doi: 10.21142/2523-2754-0904-2021-087. eCollection 2021 Oct-Dec.
3
The influence of calcium silicate-based cement on osseous healing: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
J Conserv Dent. 2023 Mar-Apr;26(2):122-133. doi: 10.4103/jcd.jcd_498_22. Epub 2023 Mar 16.
5
In vitro evaluation of the sealing ability of combined use of iRoot BP Plus and iRoot SP for root-end filling.
Clin Oral Investig. 2023 Jun;27(6):2969-2977. doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-04896-5. Epub 2023 Feb 6.
6
The study of bone healing after endodontic microsurgery using cone beam computed tomography: A retrospective cohort study.
J Clin Exp Dent. 2022 Aug 1;14(8):e652-e660. doi: 10.4317/jced.58354. eCollection 2022 Aug.
7
Prognostic Predictors of Endodontic Microsurgery: Radiographic Assessment.
Int Dent J. 2022 Oct;72(5):628-633. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2022.02.007. Epub 2022 Mar 21.
8
German Dentists' Preferences for the Treatment of Apical Periodontitis: A Cross-Sectional Survey.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 13;17(20):7447. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17207447.

本文引用的文献

1
Prognostic factors on periapical surgery: A systematic review.
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2015 Nov 1;20(6):e715-22. doi: 10.4317/medoral.20613.
2
The outcome of apical microsurgery using MTA as the root-end filling material: 2- to 6-year follow-up study.
Int Endod J. 2016 Mar;49(3):245-54. doi: 10.1111/iej.12451. Epub 2015 Apr 10.
3
Prognostic factors relating to the outcome of endodontic microsurgery.
J Endod. 2014 Aug;40(8):1071-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2014.04.005. Epub 2014 May 27.
4
Prognostic factors of clinical outcomes in endodontic microsurgery: a prospective study.
J Endod. 2013 Dec;39(12):1491-7. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.08.026. Epub 2013 Oct 15.
5
Evaluation of root-end preparation with a new ultrasonic tip.
J Endod. 2013 Jun;39(6):820-3. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.03.004. Epub 2013 Apr 13.
8
Five-year longitudinal assessment of the prognosis of apical microsurgery.
J Endod. 2012 May;38(5):570-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.02.002.
10
Prognostic factors for clinical outcomes in endodontic microsurgery: a retrospective study.
J Endod. 2011 Jul;37(7):927-33. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.04.005.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验