Gelbrich B, Fischer M, Stellzig-Eisenhauer A, Gelbrich G
University Hospital of Leipzig (Germany), Department of Orthodontics.
University of Würzburg (Germany), Institute of Clinical Epidemiology and Biometry.
J Forensic Odontostomatol. 2017 Dec 1;35(2):66-78.
The ability of cervical vertebrae (CV) staging to contribute in forensic age estimation is being discussed controversially. The large variability of CV geometries in the end stage of development might be the reason for not reaching a performance competitive to hand or third molar methods. Here we study the geometry of adult CV and demonstrate that the description of their "typical" appearance is often not met.
Lateral cephalograms from clinical routine of 320 subjects aged 20 years or above (median 24 years, 52% female) were evaluated. The criteria for the end stage of CV development (Hassel-Farman, Baccetti) were examined by assessing them in terms of metric measurements: (1) rectangular shape of C3/C4, (2) at least one of the height-width ratios of C3/C4 > 1 (both not <1), (3) significant concavities at the inferior margin of C2, C3 and C4. Metric data of the adults were also compared to those of 100 children aged 8-10 years (50% female).
Adult CV often violated the criteria of rectangular shape (44% C3, 36% C4), of height-width ratio (16% C3, 35% C4) and inferior concavity (10% C2, 10% C3, 19% C4). All of the criteria for adult CV were fulfilled in only 24% of the subjects (95%CI 19-28%). The variability of measures of the CV shapes was large; e.g., the 95% reference ranges for the height-width ratios were 0.81-1.19 (C3) and 0.77-1.14 (C4). There was a material overlap of ranges of CV measures of adults and children.
While hand bones and teeth have well-defined appearances in the end stage of development, adult CV have a large biological variance of shapes; it is hard to define their "typical" appearance. Moreover, measures of CV geometry do not strictly separate adults from children. These facts might reason the limited usefulness of CV in age estimation.
颈椎(CV)分期在法医年龄估计中的作用一直存在争议。在发育末期,颈椎形态的巨大变异性可能是其在性能上无法与手部或第三磨牙方法相媲美的原因。在此,我们研究了成人颈椎的形态,并证明其“典型”外观的描述往往并不符合实际情况。
对320名年龄在20岁及以上(中位数24岁,52%为女性)受试者的临床常规头颅侧位片进行评估。通过测量指标来检查颈椎发育末期的标准(哈塞尔 - 法曼、巴切蒂):(1)C3/C4呈矩形;(2)C3/C4的高宽比至少有一个大于1(两者均不小于1);(3)C2、C3和C4下缘有明显凹陷。还将成人的测量数据与100名8 - 10岁儿童(50%为女性)的数据进行了比较。
成人颈椎常不符合矩形标准(C3为44%,C4为36%)、高宽比标准(C3为16%,C4为35%)以及下缘凹陷标准(C2为10%,C3为10%,C4为19%)。所有成人颈椎标准仅在24%的受试者中得到满足(95%置信区间为19 - 28%)。颈椎形态测量的变异性很大;例如,高宽比的95%参考范围为0.81 - 1.19(C3)和0.77 - 1.14(C4)。成人和儿童颈椎测量范围存在实质性重叠。
虽然手部骨骼和牙齿在发育末期有明确的外观,但成人颈椎形态存在很大的生物学变异;很难定义其“典型”外观。此外,颈椎形态测量并不能严格区分成人和儿童。这些事实可能是颈椎在年龄估计中作用有限的原因。