Singh Jaideep, Dixit Pankaj, Singh Prerana, Kedia Neal Bharat, Tiwari Manish Kumar, Kumar Amit
Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Maharana Pratap Dental College, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Department of Oral Pathology, Maharana Pratap Dental College, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India.
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2017 Nov-Dec;7(6):377-380. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_419_17. Epub 2017 Dec 29.
The study was done to evaluate the pain perception, attitude, and personality trait of the patient toward orthodontic treatment.
In this cross-sectional questionnaire survey, 100 patients were divided into Group 1, 150 (75 males and 75 females) as untreated group and Group 2, 150 as treated group (75 males and 75 females). Evaluation of the patients was done based on pain perception, attitude, and personality trait. Set of questionnaire was used to assess attitude and pain perception on visual analog scale. The data were tabulated, and statistical evaluation was done using statistical software IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, (Version 21.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.) using -test and Tukey's test.
The mean pain perception for Group 1 was 4.8 ± 1.30 and 4.17 ± 1.58 in Group 2; the difference was not statistically significant ( = 0.26). The mean value for attitude in Group 1 was 3.57 ± 1.21, and in Group 2, it was 3.39 ± 1.60 ( = 0.09). There was statistically significant difference in pain perception between low (L) level to high level (H) neuroticism ( = 0.009). There was significant difference ( = 0.021) in pain for conscientiousness from very low to very high levels which is directly proportional.
The present study indicated that attitude, personality traits, and pain perception have a definite role in patient cooperation and success of orthodontic treatment.
本研究旨在评估患者对正畸治疗的疼痛感知、态度和人格特质。
在这项横断面问卷调查中,100名患者被分为两组,150名(75名男性和75名女性)为未治疗组(第1组),150名(75名男性和75名女性)为治疗组(第2组)。基于疼痛感知、态度和人格特质对患者进行评估。使用一组问卷以视觉模拟量表评估态度和疼痛感知。数据制成表格,并使用统计软件IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows(版本21.0。纽约州阿蒙克:IBM公司)进行统计评估,采用t检验和图基检验。
第1组的平均疼痛感知为4.8±1.30,第2组为4.17±1.58;差异无统计学意义(P = 0.26)。第1组态度的平均值为3.57±1.21,第2组为3.39±1.60(P = 0.09)。低(L)神经质水平与高(H)神经质水平之间的疼痛感知存在统计学显著差异(P = 0.009)。尽责性从极低水平到极高水平的疼痛存在显著差异(P = 0.021),且两者成正比。
本研究表明,态度、人格特质和疼痛感知在患者合作及正畸治疗成功方面具有明确作用。