Neuro-cognitive Psychology, Department of Psychology and Cluster of Excellence Cognitive Interaction Technology, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.
Psychol Res. 2020 Feb;84(1):231-244. doi: 10.1007/s00426-018-0988-5. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
Object perception across saccadic eye movements is assumed to result from integrating two information sources: incoming peripheral object information and information from a foveal prediction (Herwig and Schneider, J Exp Psychol Gen 143(5):1903-1922, 2014, Herwig, J Vis 15(16), 7, 2015). Predictions are supposed to be based on transsaccadic associations of peripheral and foveal object information. The main function of these predictions may be to conceal discrepancies in resolution and locations across saccades. Here we ask how predictions are affected by discrepancies between peripheral and foveal objects. Participants learned unfamiliar transsaccadic associations by making saccades to objects whose shape systematically changed during the saccade. Importantly, we manipulated the size of this change between participants to induce different magnitudes of object discrepancy. In a subsequent test, we found that judgment shifts of peripheral shape perception toward the predicted foveal input depended on change size during acquisition. Specifically, the contribution of prediction decreased for large changes but did not reach zero, showing that even for large changes (i.e., square to circle or vice versa) the prediction was not ignored completely. These findings indicate that object discrepancy during learning determines how much the resulting foveal prediction contributes to perception in the periphery.
传入的外围目标信息和来自中央凹预测的信息(Herwig 和 Schneider,J Exp Psychol Gen 143(5):1903-1922, 2014,Herwig,J Vis 15(16), 7, 2015)。预测应该基于外围和中央凹目标信息的跨眼球跳动关联。这些预测的主要功能可能是掩盖眼球跳动过程中分辨率和位置的差异。在这里,我们询问预测如何受到外围和中央凹物体之间差异的影响。参与者通过眼球跳动来学习不熟悉的跨眼球跳动关联,这些关联的目标形状在眼球跳动过程中系统地发生变化。重要的是,我们操纵参与者之间的这种变化大小,以诱导不同大小的目标差异。在随后的测试中,我们发现,外周形状感知的判断转移向预测的中央凹输入取决于习得过程中的变化大小。具体来说,预测的贡献随着变化的增大而减小,但并未降至零,这表明即使对于较大的变化(即正方形变为圆形或反之亦然),预测也不会完全被忽略。这些发现表明,学习过程中的目标差异决定了中央凹预测对周边感知的贡献程度。