Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
STATinMED Research, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
BJU Int. 2018 Jun;121(6):871-879. doi: 10.1111/bju.14152. Epub 2018 Mar 6.
To assess treatment patterns and outcomes of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) receiving first-line chemotherapy or antiandrogen therapy.
Patients initiating first-line antiandrogen therapy (abiraterone, enzalutamide) or chemotherapy (taxane) between October 2012 and September 2014 were retrospectively identified in the US Veterans Health Administration database. The impact of antiandrogen therapy vs chemotherapy on overall survival (OS) and time to discontinuation was assessed using Cox proportional hazard models, adjusting for prior androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) duration and available prognostic factors.
Overall, 1445 patients were evaluable, of whom 1108 received antiandrogen therapy and 337 received chemotherapy (docetaxel). On multivariable analysis and propensity score analysis, the OS times for antiandrogen therapy vs chemotherapy were not significantly different (hazard ratio [HR] 1.041, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.853-1.270, P = 0.694, and HR 1.047, 95% CI 0.861-1.273, P = 0.644, respectively). Time to discontinuation was shorter for chemotherapy vs antiandrogen therapy (HR 2.339, 95% CI 1.969-2.779; P < 0.001). Prior ADT duration above the median was associated with longer OS (HR 0.566, 95% CI 0.464-0.690; P < 0.001) and time to discontinuation (HR 0.831, 95% CI 0.699-0.988; P = 0.036) in the antiandrogen therapy cohort and not the chemotherapy cohort, while prior ADT duration below the median was associated with higher prostate specific antigen (PSA) response rate in the chemotherapy vs antiandrogen therapy cohort (61.5% vs 51.1%; P = 0.024). The treatment-free interval after discontinuation was longer after first-line chemotherapy vs antiandrogen therapy (mean 53 vs 39 days; P = 0.030).
After adjusting for key prognostic factors in this large mCRPC dataset, the OS was similar for first-line chemotherapy vs antiandrogen therapy despite shorter time to discontinuation with chemotherapy and longer treatment-free interval after first-line chemotherapy. These hypothesis-generating data also suggest that duration of prior ADT may assist in the selection of patients for chemotherapy vs antiandrogen therapy.
评估转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌(mCRPC)患者接受一线化疗或抗雄激素治疗的治疗模式和结局。
我们在退伍军人健康管理局数据库中回顾性地确定了 2012 年 10 月至 2014 年 9 月期间开始接受一线抗雄激素治疗(阿比特龙、恩杂鲁胺)或化疗(紫杉烷)的患者。使用 Cox 比例风险模型评估抗雄激素治疗与化疗对总生存期(OS)和停药时间的影响,调整了之前雄激素剥夺治疗(ADT)的持续时间和可用的预后因素。
总体而言,共有 1445 例患者可评估,其中 1108 例接受了抗雄激素治疗,337 例接受了化疗(多西他赛)。多变量分析和倾向评分分析表明,抗雄激素治疗与化疗的 OS 时间无显著差异(风险比 [HR] 1.041,95%置信区间 [CI] 0.853-1.270,P = 0.694,和 HR 1.047,95% CI 0.861-1.273,P = 0.644)。与抗雄激素治疗相比,化疗的停药时间更短(HR 2.339,95% CI 1.969-2.779;P < 0.001)。ADT 持续时间超过中位数与抗雄激素治疗的 OS 时间更长相关(HR 0.566,95% CI 0.464-0.690;P < 0.001)和停药时间(HR 0.831,95% CI 0.699-0.988;P = 0.036),而 ADT 持续时间低于中位数与化疗组的前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)应答率较高相关(61.5% vs 51.1%;P = 0.024)。与抗雄激素治疗相比,化疗后的无治疗间隔时间更长(中位值 53 天 vs 39 天;P = 0.030)。
在这个大型 mCRPC 数据集的关键预后因素调整后,尽管化疗的停药时间更短,化疗后无治疗间隔时间更长,但一线化疗与抗雄激素治疗的 OS 相似。这些产生假说的数据还表明,ADT 的持续时间可能有助于选择化疗与抗雄激素治疗的患者。