Welling Benjamin D, Haruno Lee S, Rosenfeld Scott B
B. D. WellingBaylor College of Medicine, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Houston, TX, USA L. S. Haruno, S. B. RosenfeldTexas Children's Hospital, Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Houston, TX, USA.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Jan;476(1):153-159. doi: 10.1007/s11999.0000000000000019.
Septic arthritis is frequently associated with adjacent infections including osteomyelitis and subperiosteal and intramuscular abscesses. While often clinically indiscernible from isolated septic arthritis, the diagnosis of adjacent infections is important in determining the need for additional surgical intervention. MRI has been used as the diagnostic gold standard for assessing adjacent infection. Routine MRI, however, can be resource-intensive and delay surgical treatment. In this context, there is need for additional diagnostic tools to assist clinicians in determining when to obtain preoperative MRI in children with septic arthritis. In a previous investigation by Rosenfeld et al., an algorithm, based on presenting laboratory values and symptoms, was derived to predict adjacent infections in septic arthritis. The clinical applicability of the algorithm was limited, however, in that it was built from and applied on the same population. The current study was done to address this criticism by evaluating the predictive power of the algorithm on a new patient population.
QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Can a previously created algorithm used for predicting adjacent infection in septic arthritis among pediatric patients be validated in a separate population?
Records for all pediatric patients (1-18 years old) surgically treated for suspected septic arthritis during a 3-year period were retrospectively reviewed (109 patients). Of these patients, only those with a diagnosis of septic arthritis confirmed by synovial fluid analysis were included in the study population. Patients without confirmation of septic arthritis via synovial fluid analysis, Gram stain, or culture were excluded (34 patients). Patients with absence of MRI, younger than 1 year, insufficient laboratory tests, or confounding concurrent illnesses also were excluded (18 patients), resulting in a total of 57 patients in the study population. Five variables which previously were shown to be associated with risk of adjacent infection were collected: patient age (older than 4 years), duration of symptoms (> 3 days), C-reactive protein (> 8.9 mg/L), platelet count (< 310 x 10 cells/µL), and absolute neutrophil count (> 7.2 x 10 cells/µL). Adjacent infections were determined exclusively by preoperative MRI, with all patients in this study undergoing preoperative MRI. MR images were read by pediatric musculoskeletal radiologists and reviewed by the senior author. According to the algorithm we considered the presence of three or more threshold-level variables as a "positive" result, meaning the patient was predicted to have an adjacent infection. Comparing against the gold standard of MRI, the algorithm's accuracy was evaluated in terms of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value.
In the new population, the sensitivity and specificity of the algorithm were 86% (95% CI, 0.70-0.95) and 85% (95% CI, 0.64-0.97), respectively. The positive predictive value was determined to be 91% (95% CI, 0.78-0.97), with a negative predictive value of 77% (95% CI, 0.61-0.89). All patients meeting four or more algorithm criteria were found to have septic arthritis with adjacent infection on MRI.
Critical to the clinical applicability of the above-mentioned algorithm was its validation on a separate population different from the one from which it was built. In this study, the algorithm showed reproducible predictive power when tested on a new population. This model potentially can serve as a useful tool to guide patient risk stratification when determining the likelihood of adjacent infection and need of MRI. This better-informed clinical judgement regarding the need for MRI may yield improvements in patient outcomes, resource allocation, and cost.
Level II, diagnostic study.
化脓性关节炎常与相邻部位感染相关,包括骨髓炎、骨膜下及肌肉内脓肿。虽然相邻部位感染在临床上常与单纯性化脓性关节炎难以区分,但对于确定是否需要额外的手术干预而言,其诊断至关重要。MRI已被用作评估相邻部位感染的诊断金标准。然而,常规MRI可能资源消耗大且会延迟手术治疗。在此背景下,需要额外的诊断工具来协助临床医生确定何时对化脓性关节炎患儿进行术前MRI检查。在Rosenfeld等人之前的一项研究中,基于呈现的实验室值和症状推导了一种算法,以预测化脓性关节炎中的相邻部位感染。然而,该算法的临床适用性有限,因为它是基于同一人群构建并应用于该人群的。本研究旨在通过评估该算法在新患者群体中的预测能力来解决这一批评。
问题/目的:(1)先前创建的用于预测儿科患者化脓性关节炎中相邻部位感染的算法能否在另一人群中得到验证?
回顾性分析了3年内因疑似化脓性关节炎接受手术治疗的所有儿科患者(1至18岁)的记录(共109例患者)。在这些患者中,只有那些经滑液分析确诊为化脓性关节炎的患者被纳入研究人群。未通过滑液分析、革兰氏染色或培养确诊化脓性关节炎的患者被排除(34例患者)。未进行MRI检查、年龄小于1岁、实验室检查不足或存在混淆性并发疾病的患者也被排除(18例患者),最终研究人群共有57例患者。收集了先前显示与相邻部位感染风险相关的五个变量:患者年龄(大于4岁)、症状持续时间(>3天)、C反应蛋白(>8.9mg/L)、血小板计数(<310×10⁹细胞/µL)和绝对中性粒细胞计数(>7.2×10⁹细胞/µL)。相邻部位感染仅通过术前MRI确定,本研究中的所有患者均接受了术前MRI检查。MR图像由儿科肌肉骨骼放射科医生读取,并由资深作者进行审核。根据该算法,我们将存在三个或更多阈值水平变量视为“阳性”结果,即预测该患者患有相邻部位感染。与MRI的金标准进行比较,从敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值方面评估该算法的准确性。
在新人群中,该算法的敏感性和特异性分别为86%(95%CI,0.70 - 0.95)和85%(95%CI,0.64 - 0.97)。阳性预测值为91%(95%CI,0.78 - 0.97),阴性预测值为77%(95%CI,0.61 - 0.89)。所有符合四个或更多算法标准的患者在MRI上均被发现患有化脓性关节炎合并相邻部位感染。
上述算法临床适用性的关键在于其在不同于构建它的另一人群中的验证。在本研究中,该算法在新人群中进行测试时显示出可重复的预测能力。当确定相邻部位感染的可能性和MRI需求时,该模型有可能作为指导患者风险分层的有用工具。关于MRI需求的这种更明智的临床判断可能会改善患者预后、资源分配和成本。
二级,诊断性研究。