Department of Orthopedics, St. Luke's Health System, Boise, Idaho, U.S.A.
University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, U.S.A..
Arthroscopy. 2018 May;34(5):1570-1578. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.12.007. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
To investigate the relation of the at-risk structures (distal femoral physis, lateral collateral ligament, anterolateral ligament, popliteus, and articular cartilage) during all-epiphyseal femoral tunnel drilling. A second purpose was 2-fold: (1) to develop recommendations for tunnel placement and orientation that anatomically reconstruct the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) while minimizing the risk of injury to these at-risk structures, and (2) to allow for maximal tunnel length to increase the amount of graft in the socket to facilitate healing.
Three-dimensional models of 6 skeletally immature knees (aged 7-11 years) were reconstructed from computed tomography and used to simulate all-epiphyseal femoral tunnels. Tunnels began within the ACL footprint and were directed laterally or anterolaterally, with the goal of avoiding injury to at-risk structures. The spatial relation between the ideal tunnel and these structures was evaluated. Full-length tunnels and partial length condyle sockets were simulated in the models using the same trajectories.
An anterolateral tunnel could be placed to avoid direct injury to lateral structures. The safe zone on the anterolateral aspect of the femur was larger than that of a tunnel with a direct lateral trajectory (median 127 mm vs 83 mm, P = .028). Anterolateral tunnels were longer than direct lateral tunnels (median 30 mm vs 24 mm, P = .041). Safe angles for anterolateral tunnels were 34° to 40° from the posterior condylar axis; direct lateral tunnels were drilled 4° to 9° from the posterior condylar axis. Sockets could be placed without direct injury to structures at risk with either orientation.
An all-epiphyseal ACL femoral tunnel can be placed without causing direct injury to at-risk structures. A tunnel angled anterolaterally from the ACL origin is longer and has a larger safe zone compared with the direct lateral tunnel.
The largest safe zone for femoral all-epiphyseal ACL drilling was (1) anterior to the lateral collateral ligament origin, (2) distal to the femoral physis, and (3) proximal to the popliteus tendon origin. A direct lateral tunnel may also be used, but has a smaller safe zone. Sockets or partial length tunnels may have a lower risk of injury to at-risk structures.
研究全骺股骨隧道钻取过程中易损结构(股骨远端骨骺、外侧副韧带、前外侧韧带、腘肌和关节软骨)的关系。第二个目的有两个方面:(1)为隧道的定位和方向提供建议,使前交叉韧带(ACL)解剖重建,同时最大限度地减少对这些易损结构的损伤风险,(2)允许最大的隧道长度增加移植物在插座中的数量,以促进愈合。
从计算机断层扫描重建了 6 个骨骼未成熟的膝关节(7-11 岁)的三维模型,并用于模拟全骺股骨隧道。隧道始于 ACL 足印内,并向外侧或前外侧定向,目的是避免易损结构受伤。评估理想隧道与这些结构之间的空间关系。在模型中使用相同的轨迹模拟全长隧道和部分长度髁骨窝。
可以放置前外侧隧道以避免直接损伤外侧结构。股骨前外侧的安全区大于直接外侧隧道(中位数 127mm 比 83mm,P=.028)。前外侧隧道比直接外侧隧道长(中位数 30mm 比 24mm,P=.041)。前外侧隧道的安全角度为 34°至 40°,与后髁骨轴的夹角;直接外侧隧道从后髁骨轴钻 4°至 9°。两种方向都可以放置窝而不会直接损伤易损结构。
可以不直接损伤易损结构放置全骺 ACL 股骨隧道。与直接外侧隧道相比,从 ACL 起点前外侧成角的隧道更长,安全区更大。
股骨全骺 ACL 钻孔的最大安全区为:(1)在外侧副韧带起点前,(2)在股骨骨骺远端,(3)在腘肌肌腱起点近端。也可以使用直接外侧隧道,但安全区较小。窝或部分长度隧道可能对易损结构的损伤风险较低。