Suppr超能文献

普瑞巴林不能改善脊柱融合术后的疼痛管理。

Pregabalin Did Not Improve Pain Management After Spinal Fusions.

作者信息

Urban Michael K, Labib Kristy M, Reid Shane C, Goon Amanda K, Rotundo Valeria, Cammisa Frank P, Girardi Federico P

机构信息

1Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021 USA.

2Department of Anesthesiology, Yale University Medical Center, New Haven, USA.

出版信息

HSS J. 2018 Feb;14(1):41-46. doi: 10.1007/s11420-017-9584-2. Epub 2017 Nov 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The treatment of postoperative pain is a challenge after posterior spinal fusions. Pain management using predominantly opioids is often associated with multiple adverse effects, while multimodal postoperative analgesia may provide adequate pain relief with fewer opioid side effects.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The purpose of this review is to determine whether addition of 150 mg pregabalin daily would reduce narcotic requirements and improve outcomes after posterior lumbar fusion (PLF).

METHODS

The method used is a randomized, controlled trial of elective PLF patients who received pregabalin or placebo. With institutional review board (IRB) approval, 86 patients undergoing elective posterior lumbar fusion, ASA I-III, were randomized to receive either a placebo or pregabalin after obtaining written informed consent. Both arms, i.e., placebo and pregabalin, consisted of 43 patients each.The 86 patients for elective PLF were randomly assigned to receive 150 mg of pregabalin 1 h before surgery and then 150 mg daily, or a placebo tablet. All patients received a similar general anesthetic and in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), started on intravenous (IV) patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) of hydromorphone (0.2 mg/ml). Postoperative pain was assessed daily until discharge using a Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at rest and with physical therapy (PT). Patients were also assessed twice daily for level of sedation and nausea and/or vomiting and expected PT milestones. All narcotics (IV, oral) were documented.

RESULTS

Demographics and operative time between groups were similar. PCA hydromorphone administration and oral narcotic intake were not statistically different between the two groups. However, an increased incidence of nausea and vomiting in the placebo group reached statistical significance ( < 0.05). In addition, there was no statistical difference between groups with respect to achieving PT milestones and hospital discharge day.

CONCLUSION

After PLF, patients receiving pregabalin 150 mg/day did not have reduced IV narcotic usage, improved PT milestones, or reduced length of hospital stay. We were unable to demonstrate an analgesic advantage to prescribing pregabalin to patients undergoing lumbar spinal fusions.

摘要

背景

脊柱后路融合术后的疼痛治疗是一项挑战。主要使用阿片类药物进行疼痛管理通常会伴随多种不良反应,而多模式术后镇痛可能在减少阿片类药物副作用的情况下提供足够的疼痛缓解。

问题/目的:本综述的目的是确定每日添加150毫克普瑞巴林是否会减少腰椎后路融合术(PLF)后的麻醉药物需求并改善预后。

方法

所采用的方法是对接受普瑞巴林或安慰剂的择期PLF患者进行随机对照试验。经机构审查委员会(IRB)批准,86例接受择期腰椎后路融合术、美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级为I - III级的患者在获得书面知情同意后被随机分为接受安慰剂或普瑞巴林治疗。两组,即安慰剂组和普瑞巴林组,每组各有43例患者。86例择期PLF患者被随机分配在手术前1小时接受150毫克普瑞巴林,然后每日150毫克,或服用一片安慰剂。所有患者均接受类似的全身麻醉,并在麻醉后恢复室(PACU)开始静脉(IV)自控镇痛(PCA),使用氢吗啡酮(0.2毫克/毫升)。术后每天使用数字评分量表(NRS)评估静息时和进行物理治疗(PT)时的疼痛情况,直至出院。还每天对患者进行两次镇静水平、恶心和/或呕吐情况以及预期PT里程碑的评估。记录所有麻醉药物(静脉、口服)的使用情况。

结果

两组之间的人口统计学特征和手术时间相似。两组之间氢吗啡酮PCA给药量和口服麻醉药物摄入量无统计学差异。然而,安慰剂组恶心和呕吐发生率增加具有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。此外,在实现PT里程碑和出院天数方面,两组之间无统计学差异。

结论

PLF术后,每日接受150毫克普瑞巴林治疗的患者静脉麻醉药物使用量未减少,PT里程碑未改善,住院时间也未缩短。我们未能证明对接受腰椎融合术的患者开具普瑞巴林具有镇痛优势。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验