Surtees P G, Sashidharan S P
J Affect Disord. 1986 Mar-Apr;10(2):101-13. doi: 10.1016/0165-0327(86)90033-9.
The use of different diagnostic classifications of psychiatric disorder in the United States and the United Kingdom, together with associated changes in the operational definitions of disorder, has placed additional barriers in the way of U.S./U.K. comparative studies. However, the parallel development of two general population studies, one in Edinburgh and one in St. Louis, MO, has enabled a comparative analysis with limited objectives, to be undertaken. This paper presents results based upon matched samples of women from these studies. The findings revealed current overall prevalence, and the socio-demographic determinants of prevalence, to be similar in the two city samples. The results additionally indicate the consequence of applying diagnostic criteria appropriate to different ranges of psychiatric syndromes for the estimation of prevalence in general population samples.
在美国和英国,精神疾病诊断分类的不同,以及相关疾病操作定义的变化,给美英两国的比较研究带来了更多障碍。然而,在爱丁堡和密苏里州圣路易斯分别开展的两项普通人群研究的同步进行,使得能够开展一项目标有限的比较分析。本文呈现了基于这些研究中匹配的女性样本得出的结果。研究结果显示,两个城市样本中的当前总体患病率以及患病率的社会人口学决定因素相似。这些结果还表明了应用适用于不同范围精神综合征的诊断标准对普通人群样本患病率估计的影响。