From the Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (U.K.B., K.S., G.I., D.D., G.L., T.R.F.), R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland
From the Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (U.K.B., K.S., G.I., D.D., G.L., T.R.F.), R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2018 Apr;39(4):658-662. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5558. Epub 2018 Feb 8.
In patients with hemorrhagic contusions, hematoma volumes are overestimated on follow-up standard 120-kV images obtained after contrast-enhanced whole-body CT. We aimed to retrospectively determine hemorrhagic progression of contusion rates on 120-kV and 190-keV images derived from dual-energy CT and the magnitude of hematoma volume overestimation.
We retrospectively analyzed admission and follow-up CT studies in 40 patients with hemorrhagic contusions. After annotating the contusions, we measured volumes from admission and follow-up 120-kV and 190-keV images using semiautomated 3D segmentation. Bland-Altman analysis was used for hematoma volume comparison.
On 120-kV images, hemorrhagic progression of contusions was detected in 24 of the 40 patients, while only 17 patients had hemorrhagic progression of contusions on 190-keV images ( = .008). Hematoma volumes were systematically overestimated on follow-up 120-kV images (9.68 versus 8 mm; mean difference, 1.68 mm; standard error, 0.37; < .001) compared with 190-keV images. There was no significant difference in volumes between admission 120-kV and 190-keV images. Mean and median percentages of overestimation were 29% (95% CI, 18-39) and 22% (quartile 3 - quartile 1 = 36.8), respectively.
The 120-kV images, which are comparable with single-energy CT images, significantly overestimated the hematoma volumes, hence the rate of hemorrhagic progression of contusions, after contrast-enhanced whole-body CT. Hence, follow-up of hemorrhagic contusions should be performed on dual-energy CT, and 190-keV images should be used for the assessment of hematoma volumes.
在伴有出血性挫伤的患者中,在增强后全身 CT 获得的标准 120kV 随访图像上血肿体积被高估。我们旨在回顾性地确定从双能 CT 获得的 120kV 和 190keV 图像上挫伤的出血性进展率以及血肿体积高估的程度。
我们回顾性地分析了 40 例伴有出血性挫伤的患者的入院和随访 CT 研究。在对挫伤进行标注后,我们使用半自动 3D 分割技术从入院和随访的 120kV 和 190keV 图像上测量体积。Bland-Altman 分析用于比较血肿体积。
在 120kV 图像上,40 例患者中有 24 例检测到挫伤的出血性进展,而只有 17 例患者在 190keV 图像上检测到挫伤的出血性进展(=0.008)。与 190keV 图像相比,随访 120kV 图像上的血肿体积系统地被高估(9.68 毫米比 8 毫米;平均差值,1.68 毫米;标准误差,0.37;<0.001)。入院时 120kV 和 190keV 图像之间的体积无显著差异。高估的平均和中位数百分比分别为 29%(95%置信区间,18-39)和 22%(四分位距 3-四分位距 1=36.8)。
与单能 CT 图像相比,增强后全身 CT 后,120kV 图像显著高估了血肿体积,从而高估了挫伤的出血性进展率。因此,应在双能 CT 上对出血性挫伤进行随访,并且应使用 190keV 图像评估血肿体积。