• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胸痛单元中医师选择心脏检查对排除无冠状动脉疾病史患者急性冠状动脉综合征的效用。

Utility of Physician Selection of Cardiac Tests in a Chest Pain Unit to Exclude Acute Coronary Syndrome Among Patients Without a History of Coronary Artery Disease.

作者信息

Howell Stacey J, Bui Jonathan, Thevakumar Balasingam, Amsterdam Ezra A

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, California.

Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, California.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2018 Apr 1;121(7):825-829. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.12.030. Epub 2018 Jan 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.12.030
PMID:29452690
Abstract

There are few data on the utility of physician selection of cardiac tests, including no-test, in a chest pain unit (CPU) to rule out acute coronary syndrome in low-risk patients without a history of coronary artery disease. We analyzed consecutive low-risk patients admitted to our CPU between 2012 and 2014 and determined the proportion of patients selected for testing, the type of initial cardiac test selected, and the incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) at 30 days and 6 months. The study group comprised 619 patients: mean age 57 years (27 to 92), 332 women (54%), and 360 (58%) with multiple cardiac risk factors. Cardiac testing included 283 no-test (46%); 179 exercise treadmill (29%); 113 myocardial perfusion stress scintigraphy (18%); <10% each for exercise stress echocardiography and coronary angiography. Testing was negative in 296 (88%), nondiagnostic in 30 (9%), and positive in 10 patients (3%). There were no MACEs at 30 days in any patients, and at 6 months, MACEs were 5 (1.1%). Length of stay was less in no-test than in tested patients (5.4 hours vs 9.8 hours, p <0.0001), and there was no difference in incidence of MACE at 6 months in no-test vs tested patients (2 MACEs vs 3 MACEs). Physician selection of cardiac tests, including no-test, promptly identified patients at low risk of acute coronary syndrome who could be safely and rapidly discharged from the CPU. Exclusion of cardiac testing shortened length of stay and was not associated with increase in MACE at 6 months.

摘要

关于在胸痛单元(CPU)中由医生选择心脏检查(包括不进行检查)以排除无冠状动脉疾病史的低风险患者急性冠状动脉综合征的效用,相关数据很少。我们分析了2012年至2014年间入住我们胸痛单元的连续低风险患者,确定了被选进行检查的患者比例、所选初始心脏检查的类型以及30天和6个月时主要不良心脏事件(MACE)的发生率。研究组包括619名患者:平均年龄57岁(27至92岁),332名女性(54%),360名(58%)有多种心脏危险因素。心脏检查包括283例不进行检查(46%);179例运动平板试验(29%);113例心肌灌注负荷闪烁显像(18%);运动负荷超声心动图和冠状动脉造影各占不到10%。检查结果为阴性的有296例(88%),未明确诊断的有30例(9%),阳性的有10例(3%)。30天时所有患者均未发生MACE,6个月时,MACE发生率为5例(1.1%)。不进行检查的患者住院时间比进行检查的患者短(5.4小时对9.8小时,p<0.0001),6个月时不进行检查的患者与进行检查的患者MACE发生率无差异(2例MACE对3例MACE)。由医生选择心脏检查,包括不进行检查,能迅速识别出急性冠状动脉综合征低风险患者,这些患者可从胸痛单元安全、快速出院。排除心脏检查可缩短住院时间,且与6个月时MACE增加无关。

相似文献

1
Utility of Physician Selection of Cardiac Tests in a Chest Pain Unit to Exclude Acute Coronary Syndrome Among Patients Without a History of Coronary Artery Disease.胸痛单元中医师选择心脏检查对排除无冠状动脉疾病史患者急性冠状动脉综合征的效用。
Am J Cardiol. 2018 Apr 1;121(7):825-829. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.12.030. Epub 2018 Jan 10.
2
Identification and Management of Intermediate Risk Patients in the Chest Pain Unit.胸痛单元中中危患者的识别与管理。
Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2020 Mar;19(1):26-29. doi: 10.1097/HPC.0000000000000202.
3
Usefulness of Predischarge Cardiac Testing in Low Risk Women and Men for Safe, Rapid Discharge from a Chest Pain Unit.低危胸痛患者出院前心脏检测对安全快速出院的作用。
Am J Cardiol. 2019 Jun 1;123(11):1772-1775. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.02.039. Epub 2019 Mar 8.
4
Single vs Serial Measurements of Cardiac Troponin Level in the Evaluation of Patients in the Emergency Department With Suspected Acute Myocardial Infarction.单一与连续测量心脏肌钙蛋白水平在急诊科疑似急性心肌梗死患者评估中的比较。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Feb 1;4(2):e2037930. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.37930.
5
Low Adverse Event Rates But High Emergency Department Utilization in Chest Pain Patients Treated in an Emergency Department Observation Unit.急诊科观察单元治疗的胸痛患者不良事件发生率低但急诊科利用率高。
Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2017 Mar;16(1):15-21. doi: 10.1097/HPC.0000000000000099.
6
Chest Pain Risk Scores Can Reduce Emergent Cardiac Imaging Test Needs With Low Major Adverse Cardiac Events Occurrence in an Emergency Department Observation Unit.胸痛风险评分可降低急诊科观察病房中严重不良心脏事件发生率较低时的紧急心脏成像检查需求。
Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2016 Dec;15(4):145-151. doi: 10.1097/HPC.0000000000000090.
7
Troponin levels within the normal range and probability of inducible myocardial ischemia and coronary events in patients with acute chest pain.急性胸痛患者肌钙蛋白水平在正常范围内与诱发心肌缺血及冠状动脉事件的概率
Eur J Intern Med. 2016 Mar;28:59-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2015.10.004. Epub 2015 Oct 27.
8
Yield of routine provocative cardiac testing among patients in an emergency department-based chest pain unit.在基于急诊科的胸痛单元中,常规激发性心脏检查的检出率。
JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Jun 24;173(12):1128-33. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.850.
9
Impact of clinical predictors and routine coronary artery disease testing on outcome of patients admitted to chest pain decision unit.临床预测因素和常规冠心病检测对胸痛决策单元收治患者结局的影响。
Clin Cardiol. 2014 Mar;37(3):146-51. doi: 10.1002/clc.22229. Epub 2013 Nov 19.
10
The HEART Pathway randomized trial: identifying emergency department patients with acute chest pain for early discharge.HEART 路径随机试验:识别可早期出院的急性胸痛急诊科患者。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2015 Mar;8(2):195-203. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.114.001384. Epub 2015 Mar 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Using HEART2 score to risk stratify chest pain patients in the Emergency Department: an observational study.应用 HEART2 评分对急诊科胸痛患者进行危险分层:一项观察性研究。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2022 Mar 4;22(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12872-022-02528-6.
2
Calcification of the heart: mechanisms and therapeutic avenues.心脏钙化:机制与治疗途径
Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2018 Jul;16(7):527-536. doi: 10.1080/14779072.2018.1484282. Epub 2018 Jun 12.