• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

计算分析确定了皮肤伤口病理性瘢痕形成的潜在预后生物标志物。

Computational analysis identifies putative prognostic biomarkers of pathological scarring in skin wounds.

机构信息

Department of Defense Biotechnology High Performance Computing Software Applications Institute, Telemedicine and Advanced Technology Research Center, US Army Medical Research and Materiel Command, MCMR-TT, 504 Scott Street, Ft. Detrick, MD, 21702, USA.

Center for Wound Healing and Tissue Regeneration, College of Dentistry, University of Illinois, Chicago, 801 S. Paulina Street, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.

出版信息

J Transl Med. 2018 Feb 20;16(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s12967-018-1406-x.

DOI:10.1186/s12967-018-1406-x
PMID:29458433
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5819197/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pathological scarring in wounds is a prevalent clinical outcome with limited prognostic options. The objective of this study was to investigate whether cellular signaling proteins could be used as prognostic biomarkers of pathological scarring in traumatic skin wounds.

METHODS

We used our previously developed and validated computational model of injury-initiated wound healing to simulate the time courses for platelets, 6 cell types, and 21 proteins involved in the inflammatory and proliferative phases of wound healing. Next, we analysed thousands of simulated wound-healing scenarios to identify those that resulted in pathological (i.e., excessive) scarring. Then, we identified candidate proteins that were elevated (or decreased) at the early stages of wound healing in those simulations and could therefore serve as predictive biomarkers of pathological scarring outcomes. Finally, we performed logistic regression analysis and calculated the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve to quantitatively assess the predictive accuracy of the model-identified putative biomarkers.

RESULTS

We identified three proteins (interleukin-10, tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinase-1, and fibronectin) whose levels were elevated in pathological scars as early as 2 weeks post-wounding and could predict a pathological scarring outcome occurring 40 days after wounding with 80% accuracy.

CONCLUSION

Our method for predicting putative prognostic wound-outcome biomarkers may serve as an effective means to guide the identification of proteins predictive of pathological scarring.

摘要

背景

病理性瘢痕是一种常见的临床结局,其预后选择有限。本研究旨在探讨细胞信号蛋白是否可作为创伤性皮肤伤口病理性瘢痕的预后生物标志物。

方法

我们使用之前开发和验证的损伤起始伤口愈合的计算模型来模拟血小板、6 种细胞类型和 21 种参与伤口愈合炎症和增殖阶段的蛋白的时间过程。接下来,我们分析了数千种模拟的伤口愈合情况,以确定那些导致病理性(即过度)瘢痕形成的情况。然后,我们确定了在这些模拟中在伤口愈合的早期阶段升高(或降低)的候选蛋白,因此可以作为病理性瘢痕结局的预测生物标志物。最后,我们进行了逻辑回归分析,并计算了接收器操作特征曲线下的面积,以定量评估模型确定的潜在生物标志物的预测准确性。

结果

我们确定了三种蛋白(白细胞介素 10、基质金属蛋白酶 1 的组织抑制剂和纤维连接蛋白),它们在受伤后 2 周内病理性瘢痕中升高,并且可以预测 40 天后发生病理性瘢痕形成的结果,准确率为 80%。

结论

我们预测潜在预后性伤口生物标志物的方法可能是指导鉴定预测病理性瘢痕形成的蛋白的有效手段。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2144/5819197/70e66f892890/12967_2018_1406_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2144/5819197/ffbd0c22bee3/12967_2018_1406_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2144/5819197/316c14c4f3e6/12967_2018_1406_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2144/5819197/363a3d5ba361/12967_2018_1406_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2144/5819197/551bd6881853/12967_2018_1406_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2144/5819197/7ec25a31d469/12967_2018_1406_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2144/5819197/70e66f892890/12967_2018_1406_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2144/5819197/ffbd0c22bee3/12967_2018_1406_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2144/5819197/316c14c4f3e6/12967_2018_1406_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2144/5819197/363a3d5ba361/12967_2018_1406_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2144/5819197/551bd6881853/12967_2018_1406_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2144/5819197/7ec25a31d469/12967_2018_1406_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2144/5819197/70e66f892890/12967_2018_1406_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Computational analysis identifies putative prognostic biomarkers of pathological scarring in skin wounds.计算分析确定了皮肤伤口病理性瘢痕形成的潜在预后生物标志物。
J Transl Med. 2018 Feb 20;16(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s12967-018-1406-x.
2
Predictive Analysis of Mechanistic Triggers and Mitigation Strategies for Pathological Scarring in Skin Wounds.皮肤伤口病理性瘢痕形成的机制触发因素及缓解策略的预测分析
J Immunol. 2017 Jan 15;198(2):832-841. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1601273. Epub 2016 Dec 12.
3
Scar-free healing: from embryonic mechanisms to adult therapeutic intervention.无瘢痕愈合:从胚胎机制到成人治疗干预
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2004 May 29;359(1445):839-50. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2004.1475.
4
Systemic effects of oral tolerance reduce the cutaneous scarring.口服耐受的全身效应可减轻皮肤瘢痕形成。
Immunobiology. 2016 Mar;221(3):475-85. doi: 10.1016/j.imbio.2015.11.002. Epub 2015 Nov 23.
5
Non-animal models of wound healing in cutaneous repair: In silico, in vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo models of wounds and scars in human skin.皮肤修复中伤口愈合的非动物模型:人类皮肤伤口和疤痕的计算机模拟、体外、离体和体内模型。
Wound Repair Regen. 2017 Apr;25(2):164-176. doi: 10.1111/wrr.12513. Epub 2017 Feb 20.
6
Advances in the modulation of cutaneous wound healing and scarring.皮肤伤口愈合与瘢痕形成调控的进展
BioDrugs. 2005;19(6):363-81. doi: 10.2165/00063030-200519060-00004.
7
Skin wound healing in different aged Xenopus laevis.不同年龄非洲爪蟾的皮肤伤口愈合情况
J Morphol. 2013 Aug;274(8):956-64. doi: 10.1002/jmor.20155. Epub 2013 May 3.
8
Scarless fetal wounds are associated with an increased matrix metalloproteinase-to-tissue-derived inhibitor of metalloproteinase ratio.无瘢痕胎儿伤口与基质金属蛋白酶与组织源性金属蛋白酶抑制剂的比例增加有关。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003 Jun;111(7):2273-85. doi: 10.1097/01.PRS.0000060102.57809.DA.
9
Molecular, histologic, and gross phenotype of skin wound healing in red Duroc pigs reveals an abnormal healing phenotype of hypercontracted, hyperpigmented scarring.红杜洛克猪皮肤伤口愈合的分子、组织学和大体表型显示出一种异常的愈合表型,表现为过度收缩、色素沉着过度的瘢痕形成。
Wound Repair Regen. 2004 May-Jun;12(3):305-19. doi: 10.1111/j.1067-1927.2004.012311.x.
10
[Inhibiting scar formation in rat cutaneous wounds by blocking TGF-beta signaling].通过阻断转化生长因子-β信号通路抑制大鼠皮肤伤口瘢痕形成
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2003 Jan 10;83(1):31-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Hypertrophic and Keloid Scar Management: Advances in Diagnosis, Perioperative Care, and Anesthetic Modulation.肥厚性瘢痕和瘢痕疙瘩的治疗:诊断、围手术期护理及麻醉调节的进展
Cureus. 2025 Jul 26;17(7):e88810. doi: 10.7759/cureus.88810. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
An in silico modeling approach to understanding the dynamics of the post-burn immune response.一种理解烧伤后免疫反应动态的计算建模方法。
Front Immunol. 2024 Jan 29;15:1303776. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1303776. eCollection 2024.
3
Cord Blood Platelet Rich Plasma Derivatives for Clinical Applications in Non-transfusion Medicine.

本文引用的文献

1
Endothelial dysfunction may play a key role in keloid and hypertrophic scar pathogenesis - Keloids and hypertrophic scars may be vascular disorders.内皮功能障碍可能在瘢痕疙瘩和增生性瘢痕的发病机制中起关键作用——瘢痕疙瘩和增生性瘢痕可能是血管性疾病。
Med Hypotheses. 2016 Nov;96:51-60. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2016.09.024. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
2
Predictive Analysis of Mechanistic Triggers and Mitigation Strategies for Pathological Scarring in Skin Wounds.皮肤伤口病理性瘢痕形成的机制触发因素及缓解策略的预测分析
J Immunol. 2017 Jan 15;198(2):832-841. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1601273. Epub 2016 Dec 12.
3
Serum Decorin, Interleukin-1β, and Transforming Growth Factor-β Predict Hypertrophic Scarring Postburn.
用于非输血医学临床应用的脐带血血小板丰富血浆衍生物。
Front Immunol. 2020 May 27;11:942. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00942. eCollection 2020.
4
Predictive Approach Identifies Molecular Targets and Interventions to Restore Angiogenesis in Wounds With Delayed Healing.预测性方法可识别分子靶点及干预措施,以恢复愈合延迟伤口的血管生成。
Front Physiol. 2019 May 28;10:636. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.00636. eCollection 2019.
血清核心蛋白聚糖、白细胞介素-1β和转化生长因子-β可预测烧伤后增生性瘢痕形成。
J Burn Care Res. 2016 Nov/Dec;37(6):356-366. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0000000000000271.
4
The molecular basis of hypertrophic scars.增生性瘢痕的分子基础。
Burns Trauma. 2016 Jan 21;4:2. doi: 10.1186/s41038-015-0026-4. eCollection 2016.
5
Biology and Biomarkers for Wound Healing.伤口愈合的生物学与生物标志物
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Sep;138(3 Suppl):18S-28S. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002682.
6
Compression therapy affects collagen type balance in hypertrophic scar.压迫疗法影响增生性瘢痕中的胶原类型平衡。
J Surg Res. 2016 Apr;201(2):299-305. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2015.10.040. Epub 2015 Nov 5.
7
Computational identification and analysis of signaling subnetworks with distinct functional roles in the regulation of TNF production.肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)产生调控中具有不同功能作用的信号子网的计算识别与分析
Mol Biosyst. 2016 Mar;12(3):826-38. doi: 10.1039/c5mb00456j.
8
Fibrosis Related Inflammatory Mediators: Role of the IL-10 Cytokine Family.纤维化相关炎症介质:白细胞介素-10细胞因子家族的作用
Mediators Inflamm. 2015;2015:764641. doi: 10.1155/2015/764641. Epub 2015 Jun 24.
9
Cellular and molecular mechanisms of repair in acute and chronic wound healing.急性和慢性伤口愈合中的修复细胞与分子机制。
Br J Dermatol. 2015 Aug;173(2):370-8. doi: 10.1111/bjd.13954. Epub 2015 Jul 14.
10
Update on biomarkers in systemic sclerosis: tools for diagnosis and treatment.系统性硬化症生物标志物的最新进展:诊断与治疗工具
Semin Immunopathol. 2015 Sep;37(5):475-87. doi: 10.1007/s00281-015-0506-4. Epub 2015 Jul 14.