Morin Chantal, Desrosiers Johanne, Gaboury Isabelle
a Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine and School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences , Université de Sherbrooke , Sherbrooke , Québec , Canada.
b School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences , Université de Sherbrooke , Sherbrooke , Québec , Canada.
J Interprof Care. 2018 Jul;32(4):463-472. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2018.1435515. Epub 2018 Feb 20.
Osteopathy is a complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) that is growing in popularity. Increasing numbers of parents are seeking pediatric osteopathic care in addition to conventional medical care. Information about the development of interprofessional collaboration (IPC) between these practitioners is scarce. This explanatory sequential mixed methods study aimed to explore enablers of and barriers to the development of IPC between physicians and osteopaths involved with pediatric patients in primary care in Quebec, Canada. Postal questionnaires about collaborative practices were first sent to all physicians and osteopaths working with pediatric patients in Quebec. Semi-structured individual interviews were then conducted with a subset of 10 physicians and 11 osteopaths. A total of 274 physicians (14%) and 297 osteopaths (42%) completed the survey. Forty-five percent (n = 122) of physicians reported that they referred at least one pediatric patient per month to an osteopath. Thirty-six percent (n = 96) of physicians and 41% (n = 122) of osteopaths indicated having professional relationships. Personal consultation, professional relationship, perceived utility of osteopathy and community practice were positively associated with osteopathic referrals. According to participants, the strongest enabler of the development of collaboration was positive clinical results reported by parents. Additional enablers included the osteopath having previous health professionals training such as physiotherapist, pediatric experience, mutual respect for professional boundaries and complementarity, perceived safety of osteopathy, and parents' requests for collaboration. Barriers were the absence of a common language, the organizational and legal context, uncertainty regarding one another's roles, lack of interprofessional interactions, and limited scientific evidence. These results related to enablers of and barriers to collaboration between physicians and osteopaths and the illustration of their dynamic interaction could be used to guide efforts to promote productive collaboration and safe patient-oriented care.
整骨疗法是一种越来越受欢迎的补充和替代医学(CAM)。越来越多的家长除了寻求传统医疗护理外,还在寻求儿科整骨疗法护理。关于这些从业者之间跨专业合作(IPC)发展的信息很少。这项解释性序列混合方法研究旨在探讨加拿大魁北克省初级保健中涉及儿科患者的医生和整骨疗法师之间IPC发展的促进因素和障碍。首先,向魁北克所有治疗儿科患者的医生和整骨疗法师发送了关于合作实践的邮政问卷。然后,对10名医生和11名整骨疗法师进行了半结构化的个人访谈。共有274名医生(14%)和297名整骨疗法师(42%)完成了调查。45%(n = 122)的医生报告说,他们每月至少将一名儿科患者转诊给整骨疗法师。36%(n = 96)的医生和41%(n = 122)的整骨疗法师表示有专业关系。个人咨询、专业关系、整骨疗法的感知效用和社区实践与整骨疗法转诊呈正相关。据参与者称,合作发展的最强促进因素是家长报告的积极临床结果。其他促进因素包括整骨疗法师以前接受过诸如物理治疗师等健康专业人员培训、儿科经验、对专业界限和互补性的相互尊重、整骨疗法的感知安全性以及家长对合作的要求。障碍包括缺乏共同语言、组织和法律背景、对彼此角色的不确定性、跨专业互动不足以及科学证据有限。这些与医生和整骨疗法师之间合作的促进因素和障碍以及它们动态相互作用的例证相关的结果,可用于指导促进富有成效的合作和以患者为导向的安全护理的努力。