Jones Paul
Department of Sociology, Social Policy and Criminology, University of Liverpool, UK.
Sociol Health Illn. 2018 Feb;40(2):327-339. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.12616.
Sociological analysis has done much to illuminate the architectural contexts in which social life takes place. Research on care environments suggests that the built environment should not be understood as a passive backdrop to healthcare, but rather that care is conditioned by the architecture in which it happens. This article argues for the importance of going beyond the hospital walls to include the politics that underwrite the design and construction of hospital buildings. The article assesses the case of the yet-to-be-realised Liverpool Royal University Hospital, and the private finance initiative (PFI) funding that underpins the scheme, which is suggested as a salient 'external' context for understanding architecture's role in the provision of healthcare of many kinds for many years to come. PFI has major implications for democratic accountability and local economy, as well as for the architecture of the hospital as a site of care. Critical studies can illuminate these paradoxically visible-but-opaque hospital spaces by going beyond that which is immediately empirically evident, so as to reveal the ways in which hospital architecture is conditioned by political and economic forces.
社会学分析在阐明社会生活发生的建筑环境方面发挥了很大作用。对护理环境的研究表明,建筑环境不应被理解为医疗保健的被动背景,相反,护理是由其发生的建筑所决定的。本文主张超越医院围墙,纳入支撑医院建筑设计和建设的政治因素的重要性。本文评估了尚未建成的利物浦皇家大学医院的案例,以及支撑该项目的私人融资计划(PFI)资金,该资金被认为是理解建筑在未来多年为多种人群提供多种医疗保健服务中所起作用的一个突出的“外部”背景。PFI对民主问责制和地方经济以及作为护理场所的医院建筑都有重大影响。批判性研究可以通过超越直接的经验证据,揭示医院建筑如何受到政治和经济力量的制约,从而阐明这些看似明显却又晦涩难懂的医院空间。