Von Der Heide Rebecca J, Wenger Michael J, Bittner Jennifer L, Fitousi Daniel
Nielsen Consumer Neuroscience, United States; The Pennsylvania State University, United States.
The University of Oklahoma, United States; The Pennsylvania State University, United States.
Brain Cogn. 2018 Apr;122:59-75. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2018.01.007. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
Theoretical analyses suggest that the regularities indicative of holistic processing can be obtained by combinations of perceptual and decisional factors. Kuefner and colleagues used electrophysiological results to suggest that the composite face effect is driven solely by perceptual factors. Two limitations of their approach are (a) it did not involve behavioral measures of perceptual sensitivity or bias, and (b) it is unclear how the measures used in that study are consistent with other measures of perceptual and decisional processing. Eight observers completed three tasks involving the stimuli used by Kuefner et al.. The first was a direct replication. The second was a complete identification task, associated with the perceptual and decisional distinctions formalized in general recognition theory. The third was an implementation of the Eriksen fianker task, which allows for a pattern of results that have been interpreted in terms of perceptual and decisional influences. While the empirical distinctions used by Kuefner et al. were not consistent with either the EEG data from the other tasks or the established behavioral measures of perceptual sensitivity and decisional bias, the inferences drawn from the EEG and behavioral data from those tasks were consistent with one another, underscoring the importance of converging operations.
理论分析表明,通过感知和决策因素的组合可以获得指示整体加工的规律。库夫纳及其同事利用电生理结果表明,合成面孔效应完全由感知因素驱动。他们方法的两个局限性在于:(a)未涉及感知敏感性或偏差的行为测量;(b)该研究中使用的测量方法与感知和决策加工的其他测量方法如何一致尚不清楚。八名观察者完成了三项涉及库夫纳等人使用的刺激的任务。第一项是直接复制。第二项是完整识别任务,与一般识别理论中形式化的感知和决策区分相关。第三项是埃里克森侧翼任务的实施,该任务可以产生一种根据感知和决策影响来解释的结果模式。虽然库夫纳等人使用的实证区分与其他任务的脑电图数据以及既定的感知敏感性和决策偏差行为测量均不一致,但从这些任务的脑电图和行为数据得出的推论彼此一致,凸显了聚合操作的重要性。