Department of Urology, Uro-Oncology Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; Department of Endourology, Sina Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Department of Urology, Uro-Oncology Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
J Urol. 2018 Jul;200(1):195-201. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.02.074. Epub 2018 Mar 1.
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy is generally performed using fluoroscopy, which is associated with exposure to radiation. Another drawback of fluoroscopic guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy is the prone position, which is not suitable for all patients. In this study we evaluated the feasibility, safety and efficacy of ultrasound guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy with the patient in the flank position.
A total of 603 patients with a mean ± SD age of 50.9 ± 13 years were included in this study from December 2010 to July 2016. Access to the collecting system and tract dilation were performed under ultrasound guidance. Perioperative data on the stone-free rate, operative time, length of stay and complication rates were recorded.
Successful access was achieved in all but 1 patient. Mean operative time was 56.6 ± 6.5 minutes. Complete stone clearance was achieved in 529 patients (87.7%) and Clavien-Dindo grade 3 complications were noted in 17 (2.8%). Blood transfusion was necessary in 43 patients (7.1%). However, bleeding was self-limited in all cases and did not require angioembolization.
To our knowledge this is the largest series of ultrasound guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy with the patient in the flank position. Unlike in other studies we used this procedure in all patients irrespective of stone burden, renal anomaly and body habitus. Ultrasound guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy has outcomes comparable to those of conventional percutaneous nephrolithotomy and it is not associated with radiation exposure. Furthermore, anesthesia while in the flank position might be less harmful in some patients, including those with obesity or cardiopulmonary comorbidities.
经皮肾镜取石术通常在透视下进行,而透视会导致辐射暴露。透视引导经皮肾镜取石术的另一个缺点是患者需要采取俯卧位,这并不适合所有患者。在本研究中,我们评估了在侧卧位下使用超声引导经皮肾镜取石术的可行性、安全性和疗效。
本研究共纳入 2010 年 12 月至 2016 年 7 月的 603 例患者,平均年龄(±标准差)为 50.9±13 岁。收集系统和通道扩张均在超声引导下进行。记录无石率、手术时间、住院时间和并发症发生率等围手术期数据。
除 1 例患者外,所有患者均成功建立了通道。平均手术时间为 56.6±6.5 分钟。529 例患者(87.7%)结石完全清除,17 例(2.8%)出现 Clavien-Dindo 3 级并发症。43 例患者(7.1%)需要输血。然而,所有患者的出血均为自限性,无需血管栓塞。
据我们所知,这是最大宗在侧卧位下使用超声引导经皮肾镜取石术的系列研究。与其他研究不同,我们在所有患者中使用了该术式,而不论结石负荷、肾脏异常和体型如何。超声引导经皮肾镜取石术的结果与传统经皮肾镜取石术相当,且不会导致辐射暴露。此外,在侧卧位下麻醉可能对某些患者(包括肥胖或合并心肺疾病的患者)的危害较小。