Suppr超能文献

[Comparison of execution time and tissue damage by using four ready-to-use percutaneous emergency airway access devices available in Poland].

作者信息

Burska Karolina, Starosta-Głowińska Katarzyna, Timler Dariusz

机构信息

Zakład Medycyny Ratunkowej i Medycyny Katastrof Katedry Anestezjologii i Intensywnej Terapii Uniwersytetu Medycznego w Łodzi, Łódź, Polska.

出版信息

Wiad Lek. 2017;70(6 pt 1):1088-1095.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Objective: Assessment of execution time and tissue damage during providing percutaneous airway access using four ready-to-use sets: Quicktrach I (Q1) and II (Q2), Portex Cricothyroidothomy Kit (PCK) and Surgicric I (SC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Material and methods:Prospective laboratory test. Each of 54 participants carried out 1 puncture on porcine larynx preparation for each of 4 sets, which resulted in a total of 216 trials. Efficacy was defined as placing a cannula in the tracheal lumen ensuring adequate ventilation. Safety was assessed based on the size and type of laryngeal damage, improper placement of the cannula, perforation of the esophagus and extensive destruction of surrounding tissues.

RESULTS

Results: The percentage of effective procedures for respective sets was: PCK - 94.4%; Q1 - 100.0%; Q2 - 96.3%; SC - 96.3%. Differences were not statistically significant. There were significant differences in duration of the procedure: PCK - 59.20 s (20.0-188.0 s, SD ± 35.25), Q1 - 21.76 s (6.0-61.0 s; SD ± 10.62), Q2 - 28.36 s (5.0-71.0 s, SD ± 14.86), SC - 48.71 s (29.0-9.0 s, SD ± 15.07). The size of the lesions of anterior and posterior walls of the larynx and trachea were significantly different. The mean (SD) lesions of the anterior laryngeal wall for respective sets were: PCK - 11.18 mm ± 5.11; Q1 - 6.59 mm ± 2.22; Q2 - 7.71 mm ± 1.87; SC - 19.85 mm ± 5.72, and for the posterior wall of the trachea: PCK - 8.29 ± ± 8.43; Q1 - 0.44 mm ± 1.22; Q2 - 0.92 mm ± 3.79; SC - 0.08 mm ± 0.27. Percentage of additional damages for respective sets: PCK - 18.5%, Q1 - no damages; Q2 - 5.6% and SC - 3.7%.

CONCLUSION

Conclusions: There were no differences in the efficacy of particular sets. Significant differences were demonstrated for the duration and safety of the procedure. The average time as well as the size of posterior wall damage and the amount of additional damage was the highest for PCK and the lowest in case of Q1.

摘要

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验