Thurston Todd E, Jackson Anee S, Nazir Naiman, Crowe Danielle, Andrews Brian T
University of Kansas Medical Center, Department of Plastic Surgery.
University of Kansas Medical Center, Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Kansas City, MO.
J Craniofac Surg. 2018 Jun;29(4):943-945. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000004412.
Ideally, all patients with isolated orbit fracture would undergo ophthalmologic evaluation before surgical intervention to rule out concomitant globe injury and possible vision loss. Unfortunately, not all institutions are capable of providing the evaluation before surgery. The authors hypothesize that the anatomic location of a single-wall orbit isolated orbit fracture can help predict the likelihood of ocular injury and thus identify high-risk patients who mandate ophthalmologic evaluation before surgical repair.
A retrospective chart review was performed at a tertiary academic medical center using the institutional trauma registry for maxillofacial trauma. All subjects with an isolated single-wall orbit fracture were included in this study. Statistical analysis was performed using a Fisher exact test.
Two hundred seventy-nine subjects with orbit fractures were identified for inclusion in this study. Forty-one of the 279 (14.7%) subjects had isolated single-wall orbit fractures. Isolated single-wall fractures included orbit floor = 19 of 41 (46.3%), medial wall = 15 of 41 (36.6%), lateral wall = 4 of 41 (9.8%), and orbit roof = 3 of 41 (7.3%). Concomitant ocular injury (13 of 41, 31.8%) was associated with isolated orbit wall fractures as follows: orbit floor = 4 of 19 (21.1%), medial wall = 6 of 15 (40%), lateral wall = 2 of 4 (50%), and orbit roof = 1 of 3 (33.3%). A Fisher exact test demonstrated that there was no statistically significant association between individual isolated wall fractures and ocular injury (P = 0.5000).
Isolated orbit wall fractures are common in maxillofacial trauma and often require surgical repair. Concomitant ocular injury is common (31.8%) with this highest incidence occurring with lateral wall fractures (50%); however, statistical analysis did not demonstrate a significant relationship between the anatomic location of an isolated single-wall fracture and eye injuries.
理想情况下,所有单纯眶骨骨折患者在手术干预前都应接受眼科评估,以排除合并的眼球损伤及可能的视力丧失。遗憾的是,并非所有机构都能在手术前提供此项评估。作者推测,单纯眶壁单壁骨折的解剖位置有助于预测眼外伤的可能性,从而识别出在手术修复前必须接受眼科评估的高危患者。
在一家三级学术医疗中心,利用颌面创伤的机构创伤登记系统进行了一项回顾性病历审查。本研究纳入了所有单纯眶壁单壁骨折的受试者。采用Fisher精确检验进行统计分析。
共确定279例眶骨骨折受试者纳入本研究。279例受试者中有41例(14.7%)为单纯眶壁单壁骨折。单纯单壁骨折包括眶底骨折41例中的19例(46.3%)、眶内壁骨折41例中的15例(36.6%)、眶外壁骨折41例中的4例(9.8%)和眶顶骨折41例中的3例(7.3%)。合并眼外伤(41例中的13例,31.8%)与单纯眶壁骨折的关系如下:眶底骨折19例中的4例(21.1%)、眶内壁骨折15例中的6例(40%)、眶外壁骨折4例中的2例(50%)、眶顶骨折3例中的1例(33.3%)。Fisher精确检验表明,单个单纯眶壁骨折与眼外伤之间无统计学显著关联(P = 0.5000)。
单纯眶壁骨折在颌面创伤中很常见,通常需要手术修复。合并眼外伤很常见(31.8%),其中眶外壁骨折的发生率最高(50%);然而,统计分析并未显示单纯单壁骨折的解剖位置与眼外伤之间存在显著关系。