Suppr超能文献

在心肺疾病急诊患者中筛查与惊恐相关的焦虑:两种自评工具的比较。

Screening for panic-related anxiety in emergency department patients with cardiopulmonary complaints: A comparison of two self-report instruments.

机构信息

Office of Clinical Sciences, Duke-NUS Medical School, 20 College Road, The Academia, Level 6, Singapore 169856, Republic of Singapore.

Office of Clinical Sciences, Duke-NUS Medical School, 20 College Road, The Academia, Level 6, Singapore 169856, Republic of Singapore.

出版信息

Psychiatry Res. 2018 May;263:7-14. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.02.031. Epub 2018 Feb 16.

Abstract

The present study examined 1) the accuracy of two self-report measures for detecting panic-related anxiety in emergency department (ED) patients with cardiopulmonary complaints; and 2) whether modified scoring resulted in improved performance. English-speaking adults presenting to the ED of a large public hospital with palpitations, chest pain, dizziness, or difficulty breathing were evaluated for the presence of panic-related anxiety with the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID) over a one-year period. Patients completed the panic disorder modules of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-PD) and Psychiatric Diagnostic Screening Questionnaire (PDSQ-PD). Sensitivity, specificity, area under the curve (AUC), and predictive values were compared for various cut-offs and scoring algorithms using SCID diagnosis of panic attacks (in the absence of panic disorder) or panic disorder as the reference standard. In this sample of 200 participants, the majority had a chief complaint of chest pain and 46.5% met SCID criteria for panic-related anxiety. The PDSQ-PD demonstrated only fair operating characteristics for panic attacks (AUC = 0.57) and good operating characteristics for panic disorder (AUC = 0.79). The PHQ-PD achieved adequate operating characteristics (AUC = 0.66) for panic attacks and good operating characteristics for panic disorder (AUC = 0.76) using a modified scoring algorithm or a single screening question (AUC = 0.72).

摘要

本研究考察了 1)两种自我报告量表在检测心肺主诉的急诊科患者的惊恐相关焦虑中的准确性;以及 2)改良评分是否会提高表现。在一年的时间里,使用 DSM-IV 结构临床访谈 (SCID),对因心悸、胸痛、头晕或呼吸困难而到一家大型公立医院急诊科就诊的英语成年人进行惊恐相关焦虑的评估。患者完成了 PHQ 惊恐障碍模块和 PDSQ 惊恐障碍模块。使用 SCID 诊断的惊恐发作(无惊恐障碍)或惊恐障碍作为参考标准,比较了不同临界值和评分算法的敏感性、特异性、曲线下面积 (AUC) 和预测值。在这个 200 名参与者的样本中,大多数人的主要症状是胸痛,46.5%的人符合惊恐相关焦虑的 SCID 标准。PDSQ-PD 对惊恐发作的表现特征仅为中等(AUC=0.57),对惊恐障碍的表现特征为良好(AUC=0.79)。PHQ-PD 采用改良评分算法或单一筛查问题(AUC=0.72),对惊恐发作具有足够的表现特征(AUC=0.66),对惊恐障碍具有良好的表现特征(AUC=0.76)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验