Pirhonen Jouko, Samuelsson Ellen, Pirhonen Tiina, Odeback Anders, Gissler Mika
Norwegian Continence & Pelvic Floor Center, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Halland Hospital, Varberg, Sweden.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018 Apr;223:56-59. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.02.010. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
To estimate the ability of an intensive interventional program to decrease the number of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS), while simultaneously decreasing the rate of Caesarean sections (CS).
The intervention, which aimed at decreasing the number of OASIS, started with a compulsory tutorial for all the midwives and physicians. At the same time, the clinic initiated a program to decrease the number of CS. We compared the outcomes before and after the intervention by calculating the risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals. The changes in selected outcomes were also tested using the test of relative proportions. The follow-up was extended for 1 year after the intervention.
The number of deliveries by CS decreased significantly, as did the number of OASIS in all the subgroups, except for the multi-parous women. The rate of OASIS for instrumental deliveries (mostly by vacuum) decreased significantly (p < 0.003), as compared to pre-interventional period. The number of Grade 4 tears decreased significantly: from 0.4 ruptures per 100 deliveries before the start of the intervention to 0.1 ruptures after the start of the intervention (RR 0.37, 95% CI 0.14-0.98, p = 0.037). However, the OASIS and Grade 4 sphincter injuries increased with forceps delivery. The CS rate decreased from 17.7 to 15.0 per 100 deliveries (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.78-0.93). The post-interventional follow-up period revealed a further decrease in the frequency of OASIS (to 1.28%, p < 0.001) and a stable CS rate (14.2%).
The intervention significantly decreases the frequency of OASIS, in line with the results obtained for earlier interventions. At the same time, a decrease in CS rate was obtained.
评估强化干预方案在减少产科肛门括约肌损伤(OASIS)数量的同时,降低剖宫产(CS)率的能力。
旨在减少OASIS数量的干预措施始于为所有助产士和医生开展的强制性培训课程。同时,该诊所启动了一项减少CS数量的计划。我们通过计算95%置信区间的风险比来比较干预前后的结果。选定结果的变化也使用相对比例检验进行了测试。干预后随访延长了1年。
除经产妇外,所有亚组的剖宫产分娩数量和OASIS数量均显著下降。与干预前相比,器械助产(主要是真空助产)的OASIS发生率显著下降(p<0.003)。4级撕裂伤的数量显著减少:从干预开始前每100例分娩0.4例破裂降至干预开始后0.1例破裂(RR 0.37,95%CI 0.14-0.98,p=0.037)。然而,产钳助产时OASIS和4级括约肌损伤增加。剖宫产率从每100例分娩17.7例降至15.0例(RR 0.85,95%CI 0.78-0.93)。干预后的随访期显示OASIS发生率进一步下降(至1.28%,p<0.001),剖宫产率稳定(14.2%)。
该干预措施显著降低了OASIS的发生率,与早期干预结果一致。同时,剖宫产率有所下降。