Mortensen Diana, Hessing-Olsen Ilse, Ekstrand Kim Rud, Twetman Svante
Quintessence Int. 2018;49(4):293-299. doi: 10.3290/j.qi.a39948.
To evaluate the clinical performance of impedance spectroscopy, laser fluorescence, and bitewing radiographs in detecting occlusal caries and compare them with visual scores.
In 62 adults, one occlusal surface per person was selected and independently examined by two examiners using the visual ICDAS scoring system, CarieScan PRO (ACIS), DIAGNOdent pen (LF-pen), and bitewing radiographs. The procedures were repeated within 1 to 4 weeks. The diagnostic performance was expressed as sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, accuracy, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) using ICDAS as gold standard. Intra- and inter-examiner reproducibility was assessed with intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) for numerical results and kappa values for categorical data. Five patients dropped out due to no-shows or restorative care.
In total, 54% of the teeth had early or no lesions (ICDAS 0 to 2) while 46% exhibited moderate to extensive lesions (ICDAS 3 to 5). The Spearman correlation coefficients were 0.65, 0.60, and 0.71 for ICDAS vs ACIS, LF-pen, and bitewing radiographs, respectively. ACIS demonstrated high specificity and positive predictive values but low sensitivity, whereas LF-pen had moderate sensitivity and high specificity. Accuracy and DOR was highest for bitewing radiographs. The ICC values ranged between 0.65 and 0.88 for ACIS and 0.89 and 0.94 for LF-pen. The weighted kappa values were 0.81 to 0.91 for ICDAS and 0.90 to 0.92 for bitewing radiographs.
All three methods were useful for detecting occlusal caries but bitewing radiography exhibited the best performance when compared with visual scoring. ACIS displayed the highest specificity and positive predictive value but the sensitivity was low and the clinical handling was less convenient. Further clinical studies are needed to evaluate the long-term effects of early caries detection on dental health.
评估电阻抗光谱法、激光荧光法和咬合翼片X线摄影术在检测咬合面龋方面的临床性能,并将它们与视觉评分进行比较。
选取62名成年人,每人选取一个咬合面,由两名检查者分别使用视觉国际龋病检测与评估系统(ICDAS)评分系统、CariesScan PRO(ACIS)、DIAGNOdent笔(LF笔)和咬合翼片X线摄影术进行独立检查。在1至4周内重复这些检查步骤。以ICDAS作为金标准,将诊断性能表示为灵敏度、特异度、预测值、准确度和诊断比值比(DOR)。使用组内相关系数(ICC)评估检查者内部和检查者之间数值结果的重复性,使用kappa值评估分类数据的重复性。5名患者因未就诊或接受修复治疗而退出。
总体而言,54%的牙齿有早期或无病变(ICDAS 0至2),而46%的牙齿表现为中度至广泛病变(ICDAS 3至5)。ICDAS与ACIS、LF笔和咬合翼片X线摄影术的Spearman相关系数分别为0.65、0.60和0.71。ACIS显示出高特异度和阳性预测值,但灵敏度低,而LF笔具有中等灵敏度和高特异度。咬合翼片X线摄影术的准确度和DOR最高。ACIS的ICC值在0.65至0.88之间,LF笔的ICC值在0.89至0.94之间。ICDAS的加权kappa值在0.81至0.91之间,咬合翼片X线摄影术的加权kappa值在0.90至0.92之间。
所有三种方法都有助于检测咬合面龋,但与视觉评分相比,咬合翼片X线摄影术表现最佳。ACIS显示出最高的特异度和阳性预测值,但灵敏度低且临床操作不太方便。需要进一步的临床研究来评估早期龋病检测对牙齿健康的长期影响。