Suppr超能文献

乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检中的淋巴结数量:外科医生是否仍存在偏见?

Number of nodes in sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer: Are surgeons still biased?

作者信息

Percy Dean B, Pao Jin-Si, McKevitt Elaine, Dingee Carol, Kuusk Urve, Warburton Rebecca

机构信息

Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Mount Saint Joseph Hospital, Providence Health Care, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

出版信息

J Surg Oncol. 2018 Jun;117(7):1487-1492. doi: 10.1002/jso.25010. Epub 2018 Feb 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to assess the number of lymph nodes removed at SLNB, and what factors might bias a surgeon's decision to remove additional nodes.

METHODS

A prospectively maintained database was reviewed. All patients that had SLNB for primary treatment of breast cancer between January 2012 and March 2016 were identified. Clinicopathologic factors were used to compare the number of LNs and rates of node positivity.

RESULTS

One thousand six hundred and three patients were included. The average number of SLNs, non-SLNs, and total LNs was 2.53, 0.54, 3.08, respectively. Significantly more LNs were removed in age <40 versus age >40 (3.73, 3.04 P < 0.01), invasive versus DCIS (3.13, 2.73 P < 0.001), Grade III versus Grade II (3.42, 2.99 P < 0.01), T2 versus T1 (3.40, 2.96 P < 0.01), and ER- versus ER+ (3.45, 3.05 P < 0.05). SLN positivity was significantly higher (P < 0.05) in invasive versus DCIS (27%, 4%), T2 versus T1 (30%. 17%), Grade II versus Grade I (42%, 18%), and ILC versus IDC (38%, 26%).

CONCLUSIONS

There was a significant difference in the number of lymph nodes removed at SLNB in certain groups however; node positivity was not necessarily higher in these groups. Surgeons must be cognizant of potential bias when performing SLNB.

摘要

背景与目的

本研究旨在评估前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)时切除的淋巴结数量,以及哪些因素可能影响外科医生决定切除额外淋巴结。

方法

回顾前瞻性维护的数据库。确定2012年1月至2016年3月间接受SLNB作为乳腺癌主要治疗方法的所有患者。使用临床病理因素比较淋巴结数量和淋巴结阳性率。

结果

纳入1603例患者。前哨淋巴结(SLN)、非前哨淋巴结(non-SLN)和总淋巴结的平均数量分别为2.53、0.54和3.08。年龄<40岁与年龄>40岁相比,切除的淋巴结明显更多(3.73,3.04;P<0.01);浸润性癌与导管原位癌(DCIS)相比(3.13,2.73;P<0.001);Ⅲ级与Ⅱ级相比(3.42,2.99;P<0.01);T2期与T1期相比(3.40,2.96;P<0.01);雌激素受体(ER)阴性与ER阳性相比(3.45,3.05;P<0.05)。浸润性癌与DCIS相比(27%,4%)、T2期与T1期相比(30%,17%)、Ⅱ级与Ⅰ级相比(42%,18%)以及小叶原位癌(ILC)与浸润性导管癌(IDC)相比(38%,26%),SLN阳性率显著更高(P<0.05)。

结论

然而,某些组在SLNB时切除的淋巴结数量存在显著差异;但这些组的淋巴结阳性率不一定更高。外科医生在进行SLNB时必须认识到潜在的偏差。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验