Semler Matthew W, Self Wesley H, Wanderer Jonathan P, Ehrenfeld Jesse M, Wang Li, Byrne Daniel W, Stollings Joanna L, Kumar Avinash B, Hughes Christopher G, Hernandez Antonio, Guillamondegui Oscar D, May Addison K, Weavind Liza, Casey Jonathan D, Siew Edward D, Shaw Andrew D, Bernard Gordon R, Rice Todd W
From the Department of Medicine, Division of Allergy, Pulmonary, and Critical Care Medicine (M.W.S., J.D.C., G.R.B., T.W.R.), the Departments of Emergency Medicine (W.H.S.), Anesthesiology (J.P.W., J.M.E., A.B.K., C.G.H., A.H., L. Weavind, A.D.S.), Biomedical Informatics (J.P.W., J.M.E.), Surgery (J.M.E., O.D.G., A.K.M.), Health Policy (J.M.E.), Biostatistics (L. Wang, D.W.B.), and Pharmaceutical Services (J.L.S.), and the Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Vanderbilt Center for Kidney Disease and Integrated Program for Acute Kidney Disease (E.D.S.) - all at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville.
N Engl J Med. 2018 Mar 1;378(9):829-839. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1711584. Epub 2018 Feb 27.
Both balanced crystalloids and saline are used for intravenous fluid administration in critically ill adults, but it is not known which results in better clinical outcomes.
In a pragmatic, cluster-randomized, multiple-crossover trial conducted in five intensive care units at an academic center, we assigned 15,802 adults to receive saline (0.9% sodium chloride) or balanced crystalloids (lactated Ringer's solution or Plasma-Lyte A) according to the randomization of the unit to which they were admitted. The primary outcome was a major adverse kidney event within 30 days - a composite of death from any cause, new renal-replacement therapy, or persistent renal dysfunction (defined as an elevation of the creatinine level to ≥200% of baseline) - all censored at hospital discharge or 30 days, whichever occurred first.
Among the 7942 patients in the balanced-crystalloids group, 1139 (14.3%) had a major adverse kidney event, as compared with 1211 of 7860 patients (15.4%) in the saline group (marginal odds ratio, 0.91; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.84 to 0.99; conditional odds ratio, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.82 to 0.99; P=0.04). In-hospital mortality at 30 days was 10.3% in the balanced-crystalloids group and 11.1% in the saline group (P=0.06). The incidence of new renal-replacement therapy was 2.5% and 2.9%, respectively (P=0.08), and the incidence of persistent renal dysfunction was 6.4% and 6.6%, respectively (P=0.60).
Among critically ill adults, the use of balanced crystalloids for intravenous fluid administration resulted in a lower rate of the composite outcome of death from any cause, new renal-replacement therapy, or persistent renal dysfunction than the use of saline. (Funded by the Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research and others; SMART-MED and SMART-SURG ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT02444988 and NCT02547779 .).
平衡晶体液和生理盐水都用于危重症成年患者的静脉输液,但哪种液体能带来更好的临床结局尚不清楚。
在一所学术中心的5个重症监护病房进行的一项实用、整群随机、多交叉试验中,我们根据患者所入住单位的随机分组情况,将15802例成年患者分配接受生理盐水(0.9%氯化钠)或平衡晶体液(乳酸林格氏液或Plasma-Lyte A)。主要结局是30天内发生的严重不良肾脏事件,即由任何原因导致的死亡、新的肾脏替代治疗或持续性肾功能不全(定义为肌酐水平升高至基线的≥200%)的复合事件,所有结局均在出院时或30天(以先发生者为准)进行截尾。
平衡晶体液组的7942例患者中,1139例(14.3%)发生了严重不良肾脏事件,而生理盐水组的7860例患者中有1211例(15.4%)发生了该事件(边缘优势比为0.91;95%置信区间[CI]为0.84至0.99;条件优势比为0.90;95%CI为0.82至0.99;P=0.04)。平衡晶体液组30天内的院内死亡率为10.3%,生理盐水组为11.1%(P=0.06)。新的肾脏替代治疗的发生率分别为2.5%和2.9%(P=0.08),持续性肾功能不全的发生率分别为6.4%和6.6%(P=0.60)。
在危重症成年患者中,与使用生理盐水相比,使用平衡晶体液进行静脉输液导致由任何原因导致的死亡、新的肾脏替代治疗或持续性肾功能不全的复合结局发生率更低。(由范德比尔特临床与转化研究所以及其他机构资助;SMART-MED和SMART-SURG临床试验注册号,NCT02444988和NCT02547779。)