UCLA Semel Institute for Neuroscience & Human Behavior, 300 Medical Plaza, Room 2273, Los Angeles, CA 90095-6968.
Cousins Center for Psychoneuroimmunology, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.
J Clin Psychiatry. 2018 Mar/Apr;79(2). doi: 10.4088/JCP.17m11597.
Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is the most robust acute treatment for severe major depressive disorder, yet clinical response is variable. Inflammation is associated with depression, especially in women, and levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) and interleukin (IL)-6 predict response to antidepressant medications. This study evaluated whether markers of inflammation predicted response to electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) in patients with treatment-resistant depression and to what extent this association differed between men and women.
In patients (N = 29) who had a current major depressive episode diagnosed using DSM-IV-TR criteria and were scheduled to undergo ECT at an academic referral center, levels of CRP, IL-6, IL-8, and tumor necrosis factor-α and severity of depressive symptoms (Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale [MADRS]) were prospectively evaluated before ECT treatment, after the second ECT session, and again at the completion of the index treatment series. Data were collected between December 2011 and December 2014. The primary outcome was end-of-treatment MADRS score.
In multivariate analyses, higher levels of IL-6 at baseline, but not other inflammatory markers or clinical variables, were associated with lower end-of-treatment MADRS score (P = .01). When stratified by sex, IL-6 remained a significant predictor of end-of-treatment MADRS for women (P = .02) but not men (P = .1), and CRP emerged as a significant predictor for women (P = .04) but not men (P = .66). CRP and IL-6 increased from baseline to the second ECT session (P values < .01) and returned to baseline levels at end of treatment; these changes did not relate to MADRS score over the course of ECT.
Levels of IL-6 prior to ECT treatment may be useful in identifying those depressed patients most likely to benefit from ECT treatment. In contrast, acute changes in IL-6 and CRP may reflect spikes in inflammatory response related to the initiation of seizure therapy, but not mood. Assessment of pretreatment inflammatory biomarkers, especially in women, might be useful in guiding treatment decision-making in treatment-resistant depression.
电痉挛疗法(ECT)是治疗严重重度抑郁症最有效的急性治疗方法,但临床反应存在差异。炎症与抑郁症有关,尤其是在女性中,C 反应蛋白(CRP)和白细胞介素(IL)-6 的水平可预测抗抑郁药物的反应。本研究评估了炎症标志物是否可预测抗抑郁药物治疗抵抗性抑郁症患者对电痉挛疗法(ECT)的反应,以及这种关联在男性和女性之间有何不同。
在接受 DSM-IV-TR 标准诊断为当前重度抑郁症发作并在学术转诊中心接受 ECT 的患者(N=29)中,在 ECT 治疗前、第二次 ECT 治疗后和指数治疗系列完成时,前瞻性评估 CRP、IL-6、IL-8 和肿瘤坏死因子-α的水平和抑郁症状的严重程度(蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁评定量表[MADRS])。数据收集于 2011 年 12 月至 2014 年 12 月。主要结局是治疗结束时的 MADRS 评分。
在多变量分析中,基线时较高的 IL-6 水平,但不是其他炎症标志物或临床变量,与治疗结束时的 MADRS 评分较低相关(P=.01)。按性别分层时,IL-6 仍然是女性治疗结束时 MADRS 的显著预测因素(P=.02),而不是男性(P=.1),CRP 则成为女性的显著预测因素(P=.04),而不是男性(P=.66)。CRP 和 IL-6 从基线到第二次 ECT 治疗时增加(P 值<.01),并在治疗结束时恢复到基线水平;这些变化与 ECT 过程中的 MADRS 评分无关。
ECT 治疗前的 IL-6 水平可能有助于识别那些最有可能从 ECT 治疗中受益的抑郁患者。相比之下,IL-6 和 CRP 的急性变化可能反映了与癫痫治疗开始相关的炎症反应高峰,但与情绪无关。在治疗抵抗性抑郁症中,评估治疗前的炎症生物标志物,特别是在女性中,可能有助于指导治疗决策。