Suppr超能文献

内分泌治疗:2 年他莫昔芬对比 2 年依西美坦治疗绝经后高危早期乳腺癌伴持续循环肿瘤细胞患者的疗效 - SUCCESS C 内分泌治疗亚研究的初步结果。

Endocrine Treatment with 2 Years of Tamoxifen versus 2 Years of Exemestane in Postmenopausal Patients with High-Risk Early Breast Cancer and Persisting Circulating Tumor Cells - First Results of the SUCCESS C Endocrine Treatment Sub-Study.

出版信息

Oncol Res Treat. 2018;41(3):93-98. doi: 10.1159/000485566. Epub 2018 Feb 27.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Optimal choice and sequence of endocrine treatment following adjuvant chemotherapy in postmenopausal early breast cancer patients are still under discussion and treatment stratification factors are missing.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Postmenopausal women with HER2-negative, hormone receptor-positive tumors and persisting circulating tumor cells (CTCs; assessed using the FDA-approved CellSearch® System, Janssen Diagnostics, LLC) after chemotherapy were randomized to 2 years of tamoxifen followed by 3 years of exemestane (tamoxifen-exemestane group, n = 54) or 5 years of exemestane (exemestane-only group, n = 54). CTCs were again assessed after the first 2 years of endocrine treatment. In addition, safety data were compared between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

The 2 groups were well-balanced with regard to baseline characteristics. The CTC clearance rate after 2 years was 89% in the exemestane-only group and 97% in the tamoxifen-exemestane group (exact Fisher test, p = 0.36). The safety profile showed good tolerability with few grade 3 or 4 adverse events in both groups.

CONCLUSION

The similar CTC clearance rate after 2 years of endocrine therapy with exemestane or tamoxifen, and the safety profiles obtained may indicate comparable efficacy and tolerability of both endocrine treatment regimens. However, these results have to be confirmed by final survival and safety analysis.

摘要

背景

绝经后早期乳腺癌患者在接受辅助化疗后,最佳的内分泌治疗选择和顺序仍存在争议,且缺乏治疗分层因素。

患者和方法

接受化疗后 HER2 阴性、激素受体阳性且循环肿瘤细胞(CTC;采用美国食品和药物管理局批准的 CellSearch®系统进行评估,Janssen Diagnostics,LLC)持续存在的绝经后女性被随机分为 2 年他莫昔芬序贯 3 年依西美坦(他莫昔芬-依西美坦组,n = 54)或 5 年依西美坦(依西美坦组,n = 54)。在接受内分泌治疗的前 2 年后再次评估 CTC。此外,比较了两组的安全性数据。

结果

两组在基线特征方面具有可比性。依西美坦组的 CTC 清除率在 2 年后为 89%,他莫昔芬-依西美坦组为 97%(确切 Fisher 检验,p = 0.36)。安全性概况显示两组均具有良好的耐受性,仅有少数 3 级或 4 级不良事件。

结论

接受依西美坦或他莫昔芬治疗 2 年后 CTC 的清除率相似,且获得的安全性概况可能表明两种内分泌治疗方案具有相似的疗效和耐受性。然而,这些结果必须通过最终的生存和安全性分析来证实。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验