Suppr超能文献

高背座椅与接受机械通气的成人骶骨组织变化无关。

Lack of Association of High Backrest With Sacral Tissue Changes in Adults Receiving Mechanical Ventilation.

机构信息

Mary Jo Grap is Nursing Alumni Distinguished Professor and Ruth S. Burk is an assistant professor, Adult Health and Nursing Systems Department, School of Nursing, Paul A. Wetzel is an associate professor and Anathea Pepperl is an assistant professor, Biomedical Engineering Department, School of Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia. Valentina Lucas is a nurse practitioner, Department of Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University Health System, Richmond, Virginia. Cindy L. Munro is dean and professor, School of Nursing and Health Studies, University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida. Christine M. Schubert is an associate professor, Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Air Force Institute of Technology, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Dayton, Ohio.

出版信息

Am J Crit Care. 2018 Mar;27(2):104-113. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2018419.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although higher backrest elevation may be a theoretical risk for integrity of sacral tissues, few data support use of high backrest elevation.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the effect of backrest elevation on the integrity of sacral tissue in critically ill adults receiving mechanical ventilation.

METHODS

Patients from 3 critical care units (surgical trauma, medical respiratory, and neuroscience) who were expected to have mechanical ventilation for at least 24 hours were intubated and mechanical ventilation was started. Participants were enrolled in the study within 24 hours of intubation. Backrest elevation was continuously measured by using mechanical system- based accelerometers. Integrity of sacral tissue was evaluated by using high-frequency sonography.

RESULTS

Data for 84 patients who had measurements of both backrest elevation and skin integrity were available for analysis. General linear models indicated no significant difference among the proportions of time spent at less than 20° ( values: .57 the first 24 hours, .17 the first 48 hours, .81 the first 72 hours), 20° to 30° ( values: .25 the first 24 hours, .08 the first 48 hours, .25 the first 72 hours), or greater than 30° ( values: .62 the first 24 hours, .28 the first 48 hours, .68 the first 72 hours) among participants with no injury, no change in injury, improvement in injury, or injury that worsened.

CONCLUSIONS

Level of backrest elevation is not associated with changes in tissue integrity. Body positioning in critically ill patients receiving mechanical ventilation may not be as important or as effective as once thought.

摘要

背景

虽然较高的椅背抬高可能对骶部组织的完整性存在理论风险,但很少有数据支持使用高椅背抬高。

目的

描述机械通气的重症成人患者中,椅背抬高对骶部组织完整性的影响。

方法

纳入预计需要机械通气至少 24 小时的 3 个重症监护病房(外科创伤、内科呼吸和神经科学)的患者,进行气管插管并开始机械通气。患者在插管后 24 小时内入组本研究。使用基于机械系统的加速度计连续测量椅背抬高。使用高频超声评估骶部组织的完整性。

结果

共有 84 名患者的椅背抬高和皮肤完整性测量数据可用于分析。一般线性模型表明,在小于 20°( 值:第 1 个 24 小时为.57,第 1 个 48 小时为.17,第 1 个 72 小时为.81)、20°至 30°( 值:第 1 个 24 小时为.25,第 1 个 48 小时为.08,第 1 个 72 小时为.25)或大于 30°( 值:第 1 个 24 小时为.62,第 1 个 48 小时为.28,第 1 个 72 小时为.68)的时间比例方面,无损伤、损伤无变化、损伤改善和损伤恶化的患者之间没有显著差异。

结论

椅背抬高的程度与组织完整性的变化无关。接受机械通气的重症患者的体位可能不像以前认为的那样重要或有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验