DairyNZ, Private Bag 3221, Hamilton 3240, New Zealand; Department of Biological Sciences, University of Waikato, Hamilton 3210, New Zealand.
DairyNZ, Private Bag 3221, Hamilton 3240, New Zealand.
J Dairy Sci. 2018 May;101(5):4690-4702. doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-14032. Epub 2018 Mar 1.
Economic optimum stocking rates for grazing dairy systems have been defined by accounting for the pasture production potential of the farm [t of dry matter (DM)/ha], the amount of feed imported from outside the farm (t of DM/ha), and the size of the cow (kg). These variables were combined into the comparative stocking rate [CSR; kg of body weight (BW)/t of feed DM available] measure. However, CSR assumes no effect of cow genetics beyond BW, and there is increasing evidence of within-breed differences in residual feed intake and between-breed differences in the gross efficiency with which cows use metabolizable energy for milk production. A multiyear production system experiment was established to determine whether Jersey (J) and Holstein-Friesian (HF) breeds performed similarly at the same CSR. Fifty-nine J cows and 51 HF cows were randomly allocated to 1 of 2 CSR in a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement; systems were designed to have a CSR of either 80 or 100 kg of BW/t of feed DM (J-CSR80, J-CSR100, HF-CSR80, and HF-CSR100 treatment groups). Data were analyzed for consistency of farmlet response over years using ANOVA procedures, with year and farmlet as fixed effects and the interaction of farmlet with year as a random effect. The collated biological data and financial data extracted from a national economic database were used to model the financial performance for the different breed and CSR treatments. On average, annual and individual season pasture DM production was greater for the J farmlets and was less in the CSR100 treatment; however, the effect of CSR was primarily driven by a large decline in pasture DM production in the HF-CSR100 treatment (breed × CSR interaction). This interaction in feed availability resulted in a breed × CSR interaction for the per-cow and per-hectare milk production variables, with HF cows producing more milk and milk components per cow in the CSR80 treatment but the same amount as the J cows in the CSR100 treatment. On a per-hectare basis, HF cows produced the same amount of 4% fat-corrected milk and lactose as J cows in the CSR80 treatment, but less fat; at CSR100, J cows produced more 4% fat-corrected milk, fat, and protein per hectare than HF cows. Our results support a greater gross efficiency for use of metabolizable energy by the J cow; 11% less total metabolizable energy was required to produce 1 kg of fat and protein at a system level. Economic modeling indicated that profitability of both breeds was less at CSR100, but the decline in profitability with increasing stocking rate was much greater in the HF breed. Holstein-Friesian cows were more profitable at CSR80 but were less profitable at CSR100.
经济最优放牧率已通过考虑农场的牧场生产潜力(干物质[DM]/公顷)、从农场外进口的饲料量(DM/公顷)和奶牛大小(kg)来定义。这些变量被组合到比较放牧率[CSR;kg 体重(BW)/可用饲料 DM 吨] 度量中。然而,CSR 假设除 BW 之外,奶牛遗传没有影响,并且越来越多的证据表明,在剩余饲料摄入量方面存在品种内差异,在利用代谢能生产牛奶方面存在品种间差异。建立了一项多年生产系统实验,以确定泽西(J)和荷斯坦-弗里森(HF)品种在相同 CSR 下的表现是否相似。59 头 J 奶牛和 51 头 HF 奶牛被随机分配到 2×2 析因安排的 2 个 CSR 中的 1 个;系统设计的 CSR 分别为 80 或 100kg BW/t 饲料 DM(J-CSR80、J-CSR100、HF-CSR80 和 HF-CSR100 处理组)。使用 ANOVA 程序分析了多年来农场单元响应的一致性,其中年和农场单元为固定效应,农场单元与年的相互作用为随机效应。从国家经济数据库中提取的综合生物数据和财务数据用于为不同品种和 CSR 处理建模财务表现。平均而言,J 农场单元的年度和个别季节牧场 DM 产量较高,而 CSR100 处理的产量较低;然而,CSR 的影响主要是由于 HF-CSR100 处理中牧场 DM 产量大幅下降所致(品种×CSR 相互作用)。这种饲料供应的相互作用导致每头奶牛和每公顷牛奶生产变量的品种×CSR 相互作用,HF 奶牛在 CSR80 处理中每头奶牛生产更多的牛奶和牛奶成分,但在 CSR100 处理中与 J 奶牛相同。在每公顷的基础上,HF 奶牛在 CSR80 处理中生产的 4%脂肪校正乳和乳糖与 J 奶牛相同,但脂肪较少;在 CSR100 时,J 奶牛每公顷生产的 4%脂肪校正乳、脂肪和蛋白质比 HF 奶牛多。我们的结果支持 J 奶牛对可利用能量的利用具有更高的总效率;在系统水平上,生产 1kg 脂肪和蛋白质需要 11%的可利用能量。经济建模表明,两种品种在 CSR100 时的盈利能力都较低,但 HF 品种的放牧率增加带来的盈利能力下降幅度要大得多。荷斯坦-弗里森奶牛在 CSR80 时更有利可图,但在 CSR100 时则不然。