Cai Yi-Ling, Ju Jin-Tao, Liu Wen-Bao, Zhang Jian
Faculty of Navy Medicine, Second Military Medical University, 800 Xiang Yin Road, Shanghai 200433, China.
Department of General Surgery, Chang Zheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, 415 Feng Yang Road, Shanghai 200003, China.
Mil Med. 2018 Mar 1;183(3-4):e97-e106. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usx048.
Forward surgical teams (FSTs) have been used as highly mobile surgical facilities that provide "damage control" medical support in modern wars. FST regiments differ greatly in different armed services and nations. We systemically reviewed the utilization of FSTs around the world with an emphasis on the medical conditions and workloads encountered by FSTs in modern wars.
We searched for terms related to FSTs, such as "Forward Surgical Team" and "Field Surgical Team," in the PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and MEDLINE databases and collected any articles that provided numerical data on the organization of medical personnel combat casualty characteristics, including the casualty composition, injury types and locations, and mechanisms of injury, and surgical procedures performed. Technical articles, case reports of specific types of injury or disease, and literature reviews of previous experiences and logistical theories were discarded.
We identified 24 articles involving 29 FSTs that were included in the analysis. The FSTs were typically composed of 8-20 medical personnel and had limited medical capacity. Battle-related injuries constituted approximately two-thirds of all injury types treated by the FSTs. The extremities, torso, and head and neck were the three most frequently injured sites and accounted for approximately 51.1%, 16.6%, and 13.2% of all wounds, respectively. The three most frequent injury mechanisms were fragments or explosive injuries (44.8%), gunshot wounds (28.1%), and motor vehicle accidents/road traffic accidents (9.1%). Soft tissue surgeries (41.0%) and orthopedic operations (31.6%) were the two procedures that were most frequently performed by the FSTs. The average numbers of surgical procedures performed by small FSTs (1.27/unit·day) and full FSTs (1.28/unit·day) seemed to be comparable.
Modern conflict may require more flexible small FSTs, especially during the initial phases of war. More orthopedic surgeons should be included in FSTs, and orthopedic skill training should be intensified before deployment. The utilization of FSTs and level III facilities must be evaluated within the context of the battlefield conditions, medical care requirements, and evacuation efficiency.
前沿外科医疗队(FSTs)已被用作高度机动的外科设施,在现代战争中提供“损伤控制”医疗支持。不同军种和国家的FST团差异很大。我们系统地回顾了全球范围内FSTs的使用情况,重点关注FSTs在现代战争中遇到的医疗状况和工作量。
我们在PubMed、EMBASE、科学网和MEDLINE数据库中搜索与FSTs相关的术语,如“前沿外科医疗队”和“野战外科医疗队”,并收集提供有关医务人员组织、战斗伤亡特征(包括伤亡构成、损伤类型和部位以及损伤机制)和所实施外科手术的数值数据的任何文章。技术文章、特定类型损伤或疾病的病例报告以及先前经验和后勤理论的文献综述均被排除。
我们确定了24篇涉及29个FSTs的文章并纳入分析。FSTs通常由8至20名医务人员组成,医疗能力有限。与战斗相关的损伤约占FSTs治疗的所有损伤类型的三分之二。四肢、躯干以及头颈部是三个最常受伤的部位,分别占所有伤口的约51.1%、16.6%和13.2%。三种最常见的损伤机制是碎片或爆炸伤(44.8%)、枪伤(28.1%)和机动车事故/道路交通事故(9.1%)。软组织手术(41.0%)和骨科手术(31.6%)是FSTs最常实施的两种手术。小型FSTs(1.27例/单位·天)和完整FSTs(1.28例/单位·天)的平均手术例数似乎相当。
现代冲突可能需要更灵活的小型FSTs,尤其是在战争初期。FSTs应纳入更多骨科医生,并在部署前加强骨科技能培训。必须在战场条件、医疗需求和后送效率的背景下评估FSTs和三级设施的使用情况。