School of Public Policy and Administration, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Division of Clinical Public Health, and Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018 Mar 7;16(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12955-018-0868-0.
China has three basic health insurance schemes: Urban Employee Basic Medical Insurance (UEBMI), Urban Resident Basic Medical Insurance (URBMI) and New Rural Cooperative Medical Scheme (NRCMS). This study aimed to compare the equity of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of residents under any two of the schemes.
Using data from the 5th National Health Services Survey of Shaanxi Province, China, coarsened exact matching method was employed to control confounding factors. We included a matched sample of 6802 respondents between UEBMI and URBMI, 34,169 respondents between UEBMI and NRCMS, and 36,928 respondents between URBMI and NRCMS. HRQoL was measured by EQ-5D-3L based on the Chinese-specific value set. Concentration index was adopted to assess health inequality and was decomposed into its contributing factors to explain health inequality.
After matching, the horizontal inequity indexes were 0.0036 and 0.0045 in UEBMI and URBMI, 0.0035 and 0.0058 in UEBMI and NRCMS, and 0.0053 and 0.0052 in URBMI and NRCMS respectively, which were mainly explained by age, educational and economic statuses. The findings demonstrated the pro-rich health inequity was much higher for the rural scheme than that for the urban ones.
This study highlights the need to consolidate all three schemes by administrating uniformly, merging funds pooling and benefit packages. Based on the contributing factors, strategies aim to facilitate health conditions of the elderly, narrow economic gap, and reduce educational inequity, are essential. This study will provide evidence-based strategies on consolidating the fragmented health schemes towards reducing health inequity in both China and other developing countries.
中国有三种基本医疗保险制度:城镇职工基本医疗保险(UEBMI)、城镇居民基本医疗保险(URBMI)和新型农村合作医疗制度(NRCMS)。本研究旨在比较这两种制度下居民健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)的公平性。
利用中国第五次国家卫生服务调查陕西省的数据,采用粗化精确匹配方法控制混杂因素。我们纳入了 UEBMI 和 URBMI 之间的匹配样本 6802 例,UEBMI 和 NRCMS 之间的匹配样本 34169 例,URBMI 和 NRCMS 之间的匹配样本 36928 例。HRQoL 采用基于中国特定值集的 EQ-5D-3L 进行测量。采用集中指数评估健康不平等,并将其分解为贡献因素以解释健康不平等。
匹配后,UEBMI 和 URBMI 的水平不公平指数分别为 0.0036 和 0.0045,UEBMI 和 NRCMS 分别为 0.0035 和 0.0058,URBMI 和 NRCMS 分别为 0.0053 和 0.0052,主要由年龄、教育和经济状况解释。研究结果表明,农村方案的富裕人群健康不平等程度远高于城市方案。
本研究强调需要通过统一管理、合并资金池和福利包来整合这三种方案。基于贡献因素,促进老年人健康状况、缩小经济差距和减少教育不平等的策略至关重要。本研究将为中国和其他发展中国家整合碎片化卫生计划以减少健康不平等提供循证策略。