Division of Rheumatology, Immunology, and Allergy, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass; Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada.
Division of Rheumatology, Immunology, and Allergy, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2018 Jul;142(1):159-170.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2018.02.018. Epub 2018 Mar 5.
The increasing use of mAbs has led to a rise in hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs), which prevent their use as first-line therapy. HSRs' symptoms, diagnostic tools, and directed management approaches have not been standardized.
We propose a novel evidence-based classification of HSRs to mAbs, based on the clinical phenotypes, underlying endotypes and biomarkers, as well as their management with desensitization.
Phenotypes, endotypes, and biomarkers of HSRs to 16 mAbs for 104 patients were described and compared with the outcomes of 526 subcutaneous and intravenous desensitizations.
Initial reactions presented with 4 patterns: type I-like reactions (63%), cytokine-release reactions (13%), mixed reactions (21%), and delayed type IV reactions (3%). In contrast, of the 23% breakthrough HSRs during desensitization, 52% were cytokine-release reactions, 32% were type 1, 12% were mixed, and 4% were type I with delayed type IV. Skin testing to 10 mAbs in 58 patients was positive in 41% of patients. Serum tryptase was elevated in 1 patient and IL-6 was elevated in 8 patients during desensitization and was associated with a cytokine-release phenotype.
HSRs to mAbs can be defined as type I, cytokine-release, mixed (type I/cytokine-release), and type IV reactions, which are identified by biomarkers such as skin test, tryptase, and IL-6. These phenotypes can be used to improve personalized and precision medicine when diagnosing HSRs to mAbs and providing management recommendations with desensitization. Desensitization provides a safe and effective retreatment option to remain on culprit mAbs as first-line therapy.
单克隆抗体(mAbs)的应用日益增多,导致过敏反应(HSRs)的发生率上升,从而使其无法作为一线治疗药物。HSRs 的症状、诊断工具和针对性管理方法尚未标准化。
我们基于临床表型、潜在的表型和生物标志物,以及脱敏治疗的管理方法,提出了一种新的 mAbs 相关 HSRs 的基于证据的分类方法。
我们描述了 104 例患者的 16 种 mAbs 相关 HSRs 的表型、表型和生物标志物,并与 526 例皮下和静脉脱敏治疗的结果进行了比较。
初始反应有 4 种模式:I 型样反应(63%)、细胞因子释放反应(13%)、混合反应(21%)和迟发型 IV 型反应(3%)。相比之下,脱敏治疗期间 23%的突破性 HSRs 中,52%为细胞因子释放反应,32%为 I 型,12%为混合,4%为伴有迟发型 IV 型的 I 型。58 例患者进行了 10 种 mAbs 的皮肤试验,其中 41%的患者呈阳性。在脱敏治疗期间,1 例患者的血清类胰蛋白酶升高,8 例患者的 IL-6 升高,与细胞因子释放表型相关。
mAbs 相关 HSRs 可定义为 I 型、细胞因子释放型、混合(I 型/细胞因子释放型)和 IV 型反应,可通过皮肤试验、类胰蛋白酶和 IL-6 等生物标志物来识别。这些表型可用于改善 mAbs 相关 HSRs 的诊断,并提供脱敏治疗的管理建议,从而实现个性化和精准医疗。脱敏治疗是一种安全有效的再治疗选择,可使患者继续使用有问题的 mAbs 作为一线治疗药物。