Cradic Kendall W, Lasho Michael A, Algeciras-Schimnich Alicia
Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
Ann Clin Lab Sci. 2018 Jan;48(1):90-93.
Assessing the risk of malignancy in patients with a pelvic mass helps triage women suspected of ovarian cancer to specialized gynecologic oncologists to improve treatment outcomes. To this end, several algorithms have been proposed; most notably, the Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm (ROMA) based on CA125, HE4, and menopausal status. However, appropriate decision cut-points for the ROMA score depends on the choice of analytical assays used. This study validates the use of the Roche Elecsys CA125 and HE4 assays for ROMA calculation in a cohort of 207 women who presented to Mayo Clinic with a pelvic mass. Results were compared to a definitive histologic diagnosis in each case. Clinical performance of ROMA scores derived using these assays was similar to stated claims and indicates that recommended cut-points are acceptable for clinical use.
评估盆腔肿块患者的恶性肿瘤风险有助于将疑似卵巢癌的女性分诊至专业的妇科肿瘤学家处,以改善治疗结果。为此,已提出了几种算法;最值得注意的是基于CA125、HE4和绝经状态的卵巢恶性肿瘤风险算法(ROMA)。然而,ROMA评分的合适决策切点取决于所使用的分析检测方法的选择。本研究在207名因盆腔肿块就诊于梅奥诊所的女性队列中,验证了罗氏电化学发光法CA125和HE4检测用于ROMA计算的情况。将结果与每个病例的最终组织学诊断进行比较。使用这些检测方法得出的ROMA评分的临床性能与所述声明相似,表明推荐的切点可用于临床。