Wills Bradley, Lee Sung Ro, Hudson Parke William, SahraNavard Bahman, de Cesar Netto Cesar, Naranje Sameer, Shah Ashish
University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
Foot Ankle Spec. 2019 Feb;12(1):34-38. doi: 10.1177/1938640018762556. Epub 2018 Mar 13.
Calcaneal osteotomy is a commonly used surgical option for the correction of hindfoot malalignment. A previous cadaveric study described a neurological "safe zone" for calcaneal osteotomy. We performed a retrospective chart review to evaluate the presence of neurological injuries following calcaneal osteotomies and the location of the osteotomy in relation to the reported safe zone.
In this retrospective study, we reviewed charts of patients who underwent calcaneal osteotomy at our institution from 2011 to 2015. All immediate postoperative radiographs were examined and the shortest distance between the calcaneal osteotomy line and a reference line connecting the posterior superior apex of the calcaneal tuberosity to the origin of the plantar fascia was measured. If the osteotomy line was positioned within an area 11.2 mm anterior to the reference line, it was considered to be inside the neurological safe zone. We correlated the positioning of the osteotomy with the presence of postoperative neurological complications.
We identified 179 calcaneal osteotomy cases. Of the 174 (97.2%) nerve injury-free cases, 62.6% (109/174) were performed inside the defined "safe zone" while 37.4% (65/174) outside. A total of 5 (2.8%) nerve complications were identified: 3 (60%) were inside the safe zone and 2 (40%) outside the safe zone. Osteotomies outside the safe zone had a 1.114 relative risk of nerve injury with a 95% CI of 0.191 to 6.500 and showed no statistically significant difference ( P = .9042).
Our findings suggest that the clinical "safe zone" in calcaneal osteotomies may not actually exist, likely because of wide anatomical variation of the implicated nerves, as described in prior studies. Patients should be properly counseled preoperatively on the low, but seemingly fixed, risk of nerve injury before undergoing calcaneal osteotomy.
Level III: Retrospective comparative study.
跟骨截骨术是矫正后足畸形常用的手术方式。此前一项尸体研究描述了跟骨截骨术的神经“安全区”。我们进行了一项回顾性病历审查,以评估跟骨截骨术后神经损伤的情况以及截骨位置与所报道安全区的关系。
在这项回顾性研究中,我们查阅了2011年至2015年在我院接受跟骨截骨术患者的病历。检查所有术后即刻的X线片,并测量跟骨截骨线与连接跟骨结节后上顶点至足底筋膜起点的参考线之间的最短距离。如果截骨线位于参考线前方11.2 mm范围内的区域,则认为其位于神经安全区内。我们将截骨位置与术后神经并发症的发生情况进行关联分析。
我们共识别出179例跟骨截骨病例。在174例(97.2%)无神经损伤的病例中,62.6%(109/174)在定义的“安全区”内进行,37.4%(65/174)在安全区外进行。共识别出5例(2.8%)神经并发症:3例(60%)在安全区内,2例(40%)在安全区外。安全区外的截骨术发生神经损伤的相对风险为1.114,95%可信区间为0.191至6.500,差异无统计学意义(P = .9042)。
我们的研究结果表明,跟骨截骨术中的临床“安全区”可能实际上并不存在,可能是由于如先前研究所描述的相关神经存在广泛的解剖变异。在患者接受跟骨截骨术前,应就神经损伤的低但似乎固定的风险进行适当的术前咨询。
III级:回顾性比较研究。