Suppr超能文献

经导管动脉化疗栓塞联合射频消融与肝切除术治疗初始手术后复发性肝细胞癌的比较:倾向评分匹配研究。

Combined transcatheter arterial chemoembolization and radiofrequency ablation versus hepatectomy for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after initial surgery: a propensity score matching study.

机构信息

Department of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, 58 Zhongshan Road 2, Guangzhou, 510080, China.

Clinical Trials Unit, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, 58 Zhongshan Road 2, Guangzhou, 510080, China.

出版信息

Eur Radiol. 2018 Aug;28(8):3522-3531. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-5166-4. Epub 2018 Mar 13.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare retrospectively the efficacy of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus radiofrequency ablation (RFA) (TACE-RFA) with that of repeat hepatectomy in the treatment of initial recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after hepatectomy by propensity score matching (PSM).

METHODS

From September 2006 to June 2015, 186 patients who underwent TACE-RFA (n=107) or repeat hepatectomy (n=79) for recurrent HCC ≤ 5.0 cm were included. The overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were compared. PSM was used to correct potential confounding factors between these two groups.

RESULTS

1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates after TACE-RFA and repeat hepatectomy were 84.6%, 66.9%, 49.1%, and 84.8%, 60.2%, 51.9%, respectively (p=.871). The corresponding DFS rates were 58.2%, 35.2%, 29.6% and 64.8%, 41.6%, 38.3% (p=.258). TACE-RFA has lower major complication rates (p=.009) and shorter hospital stay (p<.001). After PSM, 1-, 3-, 5- year OS rates after TACE-RFA (n=51) and repeat hepatectomy (n=51) were 84.3%, 60.4%, 46.4% and 84.3%, 64.5%, 49.8% (p=.951), the corresponding DFS rates were 54.9%, 35.0%, 30.6% and 58.7%, 35.8%, and 33.6% (p=.733). AFP and micro-vessel invasion of initial tumour were significant prognostic factors for OS and DFS, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

TACE-RFA provides comparable OS and DFS to repeat hepatectomy, fewer major complications and shorter hospital stay.

KEY POINTS

• TACE-RFA achieved similar OS and DFS with repeat hepatectomy for recurrent HCC • Major complication rate was lower in the TACE-RFA group • The hospital stay was shorter in the TACE-RFA group • AFP was a predictor for OS, MVI was a predictor for DFS • The treatment strategies were not significant prognostic factor for OS or DFS.

摘要

目的

采用倾向性评分匹配(PSM)方法,回顾性比较经导管动脉化疗栓塞术(TACE)联合射频消融术(RFA)(TACE-RFA)与重复肝切除术治疗肝癌切除术后早期复发肝癌(HCC)的疗效。

方法

本研究纳入了 2006 年 9 月至 2015 年 6 月期间,186 例接受 TACE-RFA(n=107)或重复肝切除术(n=79)治疗复发 HCC≤5.0cm 的患者。比较了两组患者的总生存(OS)和无病生存(DFS)。采用 PSM 校正两组之间潜在的混杂因素。

结果

TACE-RFA 和重复肝切除术的 1、3、5 年 OS 率分别为 84.6%、66.9%、49.1%和 84.8%、60.2%、51.9%(p=.871)。相应的 DFS 率分别为 58.2%、35.2%、29.6%和 64.8%、41.6%、38.3%(p=.258)。TACE-RFA 组主要并发症发生率较低(p=.009),住院时间较短(p<.001)。PSM 后,TACE-RFA(n=51)和重复肝切除术(n=51)的 1、3、5 年 OS 率分别为 84.3%、60.4%、46.4%和 84.3%、64.5%、49.8%(p=.951),相应的 DFS 率分别为 54.9%、35.0%、30.6%和 58.7%、35.8%、33.6%(p=.733)。初始肿瘤的 AFP 和微血管侵犯是 OS 和 DFS 的独立预后因素。

结论

TACE-RFA 与重复肝切除术相比,可获得相似的 OS 和 DFS,且主要并发症发生率较低,住院时间较短。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验