Suppr超能文献

[下胫腓联合损伤的分类与治疗]

[Classification and treatment of syndesmotic injury].

作者信息

Wu Zhi-Peng, Chen Peng-Tao, He Jin-Shan, Wang Jing-Cheng

机构信息

Xiangya No.2 Hospital of Central South University, Changsha 410011, Hunan, China;

出版信息

Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2018 Feb 25;31(2):190-194. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2018.02.020.

Abstract

The distal tibiofibular syndesmosis is a critical structure in maintaining the ankle stability. Syndesmotic injuries are usually associated with ankle fractures and high fibula fractures. Non-isolated and partially isolated syndesmotic injuries are involved in unstable injuries, which need to operative treatment. Partially isolated syndesmotic injuries belong to stable injuries, which should be treated with non-operative management. It is becoming clear that early fixation and stabilization for unstable injuries are probably better than non-treatment or delayed treatment. It still remains without consensus of accurately defining stable from unstable injuries and sufficiently differentiating between acute and chronic injuries. Because of stability, fixation type, and duration, the clinical efficacy is different. Screw fixation is a gold standard treatment of syndesmotic injury. However, it remains controversial that whether removal of the syndesmotic screw is required and effect of the level of syndesmotic screw insertion, limited micro-movement is one of disadvantages of screw fixation. Micro-movement of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis has been paid more and more attention. Dynamic fixation is a viable alternative to the static fixation device, with lower re-operation rates and less complications, which has obtained a great short-term clinical efficacy. However, further long-term studies should be carried out to confirm this clinical efficacy. Optimized treatment strategies considering stability of syndesmotic injury, duration, and fixation type can help to improve clinical efficacy.

摘要

胫腓下联合是维持踝关节稳定性的关键结构。下联合损伤通常与踝关节骨折和高位腓骨骨折相关。非孤立性和部分孤立性下联合损伤属于不稳定损伤,需要手术治疗。部分孤立性下联合损伤属于稳定损伤,应采用非手术治疗。目前越来越明确的是,对不稳定损伤进行早期固定和稳定处理可能优于不治疗或延迟治疗。在准确界定稳定损伤与不稳定损伤以及充分区分急性损伤和慢性损伤方面,目前仍未达成共识。由于稳定性、固定类型和持续时间不同,临床疗效也有所差异。螺钉固定是下联合损伤的金标准治疗方法。然而,是否需要取出下联合螺钉以及下联合螺钉置入水平的影响仍存在争议,有限的微动是螺钉固定的缺点之一。胫腓下联合的微动已受到越来越多的关注。动态固定是静态固定装置的一种可行替代方案,再手术率较低且并发症较少,已取得了良好的短期临床疗效。然而,还需要进一步的长期研究来证实这种临床疗效。考虑下联合损伤的稳定性、持续时间和固定类型的优化治疗策略有助于提高临床疗效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验