Jankowska Sylwia
Pomeranian J Life Sci. 2016;62(3):16-20.
Sentinel lymph node biopsy is an increasingly popular method of breast cancer treatment. In order to determine the number and location of potentially positive nodes, it is necessary to perform sentinel node lymphoscintigraphy. The quality of the image depends on the use of the appropriate method of radionuclide imaging. The aim of this study was to compare the sensitivity of SPECT, SPECT/CT and classical planar acquisitions in the detection of sentinel lymph nodes for sentinel node lymphoscintigraphy in breast cancer. In addition, we tried to verify the usefulness of the morphological image obtained by SPECT/CT to specify their location.
We studied 62 women (mean age = 58, SD = 10.28) with histologically confirmed breast cancer (T0-2N0M0). Planar, SPECT and SPECT/CT images were interpreted separately in terms of the number and location of sentinel lymph nodes and lymphatic drainage direction.
Planar images detected 93 sentinel lymph nodes, while SPECT and SPECT/CT showed 114 nodes (about 22% more). In 15 (24%) patients SPECT imaging detected more sentinel lymph nodes than planar. Planar imaging was negative for the identification of sentinel lymph nodes in 6 (10%) patients. SPECT/CT images showed sentinel lymph nodes in all patients. The node to background ratio on the planar images was 11.6, on the SPECT 134.9, and on the SPECT/CT 147.5. The direction of lymphatic drainage and location of axillary lymph nodes were established only on SPECT/CT images.
The use of SPECT imaging for sentinel node lymphoscintigraphy in breast cancer increases the sensitivity of sentinel lymph nodes detection. The use of low-dose CT as attenuation correction for SPECT images improves their contrast without a significant effect on the number of detected sentinel lymph nodes. It also brings important anatomical information, which is difficult or even impossible to determine by planar and SPECT images.
前哨淋巴结活检是一种越来越流行的乳腺癌治疗方法。为了确定潜在阳性淋巴结的数量和位置,有必要进行前哨淋巴结淋巴闪烁显像。图像质量取决于放射性核素成像方法的使用。本研究的目的是比较SPECT、SPECT/CT和传统平面采集在乳腺癌前哨淋巴结淋巴闪烁显像中检测前哨淋巴结的敏感性。此外,我们试图验证通过SPECT/CT获得的形态学图像在确定其位置方面的有用性。
我们研究了62名经组织学确诊为乳腺癌(T0-2N0M0)的女性(平均年龄 = 58岁,标准差 = 10.28)。分别根据前哨淋巴结的数量、位置以及淋巴引流方向对平面图像、SPECT图像和SPECT/CT图像进行解读。
平面图像检测到93个前哨淋巴结,而SPECT和SPECT/CT显示有114个淋巴结(多出约22%)。在15名(24%)患者中,SPECT成像检测到的前哨淋巴结比平面成像更多。平面成像在6名(10%)患者中未能识别出前哨淋巴结。SPECT/CT图像在所有患者中均显示出前哨淋巴结。平面图像上的淋巴结与背景比值为11.6,SPECT上为134.9,SPECT/CT上为147.5。仅在SPECT/CT图像上确定了淋巴引流方向和腋窝淋巴结的位置。
在乳腺癌前哨淋巴结淋巴闪烁显像中使用SPECT成像可提高前哨淋巴结检测的敏感性。使用低剂量CT对SPECT图像进行衰减校正可改善其对比度,而对检测到的前哨淋巴结数量无显著影响。它还带来了重要的解剖学信息,这是平面图像和SPECT图像难以甚至无法确定的。